Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 1
Page 90
90 / 127
REPORT
@ of the @
- FBIE-
i Peer eatery
FEGERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
WASHINGTON. D.C
PUPA ELErW RE ea ee ee
+5 .
fe: |
Lnsuvu} yet
Anomyno.s .cusinigation | vetmarsed
W/lu/Sc, ovitoar, «a.
weeere of tite. 20 ob, esa court © ViCTix
RaTa aati
INIT] acest received 13/22/38
Request for ecoaperison of writior ‘dn this caze with lettera in duflie pe35. db.
Result of examination:
It was concluded that specingns £35130, G3 thro
by the writer of M1 in the instant esse. Becanse ef the
eompareble xaterial ard the possi le presence of dizriise in the questioned
writing, @ definite conclusion wes not reached as te whether the wi ef
fu the instant case prepered specizers 935190, W and @, but sinilaritics
were acted as 8 result of this conperisen.
Because ef the leck ef suffielent ecmparedle material end the
possible presence of discuise, a definite conclusion » a pot reashed se te
whether speciaers 9-351), <1 through G6, were prepared by the writer of
Gl and \? in the insta:t case but som sintlerities were noted.
— Or rc £
a } ay .- .
+ ‘eG: a
mG
— *
fee?
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic