Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 2
Page 16
16 / 112
Pe
“Avonynous Communication
Addressed *U, S. Supreme Cert,
washington 25, D. C.," Postmaried =
Clarksdale, Mississippi, March 19, 1962
call from where they are, they would say + —
TREPEAT COMRADES -- there is a HELL.' Ir you
j DARE take God and prayer out of our schools,
; YOU LOSE} Every koee shall bow to GOD!
Remember this! april 3rd will be BDOONS DAY
for you, if you-dare take God and prayer from
our schools. This is God's worldt™ -
The words “includes Catholics” are written in pen
and ink as marginal words with an arrow poictixng to the
printed word "TAAPFTOXHS.§ At the top of the corsaunicationa,
handwritten in pen acd ick, excep. the nate "KEN.EDYS*® which
is printed in red crayor, is the sentence "Pass this or to
all the fiithy KEE KEDYS,®
ary
The date 3rd, referred to in the ‘communication,
_ 9 cording to ae. da the day on which argurents ere
to be heard i e United States Supreme Court in the case
entitled "Steven I, Engel, Et Al, Petitiosersa vs. William J.
i Vitale, Et Al, Case Kumber 468 Appellate.© This case has
i come to the United States Supreme Court frog the Court of
4 Appeals of Kew York as a result of a petition for Writ of
| Certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court on
i October 3, 1961. Petitioners state therein they are opposed
to daily prayer in ‘public schools, Kassau County, New York,
; -,.. , and that the practice of saying one specific religious
, Fy os prayer violates the firat and 14th amendments of the Constitution.
ghe facts in this case were presented on March 22,
"1963, to Assiatant United States Attorney Joho C. Conliff. .
f EAS,
ae *
tae we Mr. Conliff stated that while some of the rerarks are
ecurrilous, the letter does not contair ary direct threat
against the Justices of the United States Suprene Court.
He stated further that in the ebsence of direct threats is
the letter, prosecution would not be warrarted.
: o 2 =
CB ge by eee a ne eee
ETRE We eS chee cs, , ;
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic