Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 4
Page 25
25 / 78
* -. “ TA ert a. ee
pris ao
High Court to Revie
ay
at
vor.
7
‘Agrees to Weigh Evidence; view Br
Biddle’s Attempt to Limit: Issue 3
Special to tbe Dally Weekes — - ee te fee Ls
WASHINGTON, Jan. 29.—The ‘Supreme ‘Coust ‘announced today that we
it was granting a formal review of Harry Bridges’ suit against deportation
to Australia. The Court's decision is a defeat for Attorney General Fran- {we ‘tan Pranctens waterfront,”
= gis Biddle, wha ordered the , St War cargoes were being loaded
lifornia ClO leader deport- Seer
‘Communism. .
Such "deportation would ? Nevertheless, Biadle continued to
ave taker one of the out- ]Press for Bridges’ deportation.
supporters of the no-strike | Red-beiting wttacks on Bridges
icy from America and have giv- jbewan in 1933 when he organised
$harmous comiort t2 the Trotr- [his fellow longahoremen iy San
ma who fF itited ¥ . |FTEnCIaCy into SPL longthore-
pearing Tunes Bia wae |e tion. The atiacks eaned
i ‘The Court rejected the Depart @ Crescendo In 1934 when Bridges
) -iaeht of Justice's request to limit Jed the great waterfront strike. They
a ae,
a
4
bits conaderation enly ta the imma 4 tCoatinued when Bridges led the.
tef the consiitutionality of the ae- | Workers into the CIO in 1971.
pretation ond te itfuse com- In 1929, the red-balters' campaign
ne men Bridaes’ charges thet for Bridges’ deportation fed to «
the Deparment acted an bad ey- hesring before James M. Landis,
mye Mence and wed Wreng procedure, ~Desn of Harvard Law School, as’
oom [7m one decided imateal wo tee” the Government's referee,
prmedee question of evidence and - Landiz ruled that Bridges testi-
Fi | ey
Mltutionality, |
ai HOt be reached for comment. | Ct ef detmecraiic methods”
| At ihe seme time the Court de- || <is branded the testimony of the
a motion of the Commiumisi jj stoclpigeons and ex-conricts wi
Witice! Association to fntervene in Tsppke against Bridges aq evastye,
case. The asociation wished |!comtradictory and unreliable, - |
present evidence refuting Biddie's © ‘The Department of Justloe tried
statement that the Communist to deport Bridges again on the basis’
pougst to overthrow the a new statute. A hand-picked’
La
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics