◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 5

77 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Aug 22, 1960 · Broad topic: Cold War & Communism · Topic: Supreme Court · 76 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
yo Two Negroes OntTah Rine’ Wit wv Asis /. WASHINGTON, Nov. ““Aqunstall and Bester Willi (-] southern: railroads, — appeared through counsel before the La mm are | reme Col oday and argw@t Paat. while f of Lo- jcomotive Fire G F FEPreseNtet ait tie Tremen on thé two systems as exclusive bargain- . even made agreements with the jand unemployment for Negro fire- men. i ™ Government, through Charles AN Fahy, Solicitor General, and Rob- the Attorney General and the Na- tional Labor Relations Board, in- tervened as “friends of the court.” : Stern argued that, since the unton 2 excluded Negroes from member- . \ahip, it was “obviously not acting ‘in. good faith as the representative ot e entire craft.” ; | The two firemen requested a ‘union represent all employes fair- agreement with the carriers and their positions. _ \ | Attorneys for the brotherhood -ville & Nashville and the Norfolk eral Court had no jurisdiction In | Act and that, in the Tunstall ac- tion, the union had not been prop- erly served. ns . 7 Charles H. Houston, attorney for the two firemen, maintained that uhder the principle of majority rule the majority could not use the Government te exploit the minor- ¥, , However, he said, the union, act- ing for the entire class or craft of firamen undar the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, had, on Fein 28, 1041, made an agreement with & groyp Southern roads that not more 50 per cent of the firem gentority district 3 1 iT} . CUA PINE nc. TST. Pes De r By LOUIS STARK Special to Tax New Tore Traxs. eames, €lto appear before a body composed ing agents, it barred Negroes and) niong which bar Negroes. Supporting this plea, the Federal G,, a LL. Stern, special assistant to|,, In a joint brief, Mr. Fahy and Mr. broader than race and that if ldeclaratory judgment that thel® that petitioners be restored t6/vernely affected had recourse to ‘and for the two roads, the Louis-/tne courts. ae: Rate a TET nated as “non-promotable’ and this meant that the places of the Negro firemen, deapite long senior- ity, would be taken by white fire- men of lesser seniority. According to Mr. Houston, if a Negro fireman tried to bring a ase of discrimination before the adiustment board he would have partly of employers and partly of Therefore, he told the court, un- | carriers that resulted in demotlon)iogy the firemen could go to the! courts for relief they had been! placed in “economic servitude” by . ngress, which passed the Ratl-| way Labor Act. | The justices expressed a lively: terest in the case and asked the! attorneys many questions. i In reply te one question, Mr.: Houston said that the issue was. the unfon could bar Negroes today it could “bar Catholics, Jews and sbc feet, men tomorrow.” - _ Harold O. Helss, counsel for the. brotherhood, asserted that Con- oases did nat lecislate on the rela-! tion of ‘employes “and their ‘yepres: sentatives under the Railway La-| ‘ly, that an injunction be issued arty ‘againat enforcement of the union bor 4 tra erie the co He declared that employes ad- the National Mediation Board and Tee oS ene tee the adjustment board as well az “Can promotable men be black ?” Southern, asserted that the Fed-lagked Justice Frankfurter. “Not on the railroads of the the case, that the proper remedy |railroads of the United States,” re- wan before the National Mediation | plied Mr, Hates. Board or the adjustment board|icy of the roads. We have nothing created under the Railway Labor! to do with it,” : . “That ia the pol- “Then the fdea of the motable men is based asked Justice Murphy. oe “That's rallroad policy,” the brotherhood attorney answered. sty said that hundreds of “senior-|[. the: difference between these and the non-pro- on races?”|) aA Tunstall case was that “the pet!-j ae Qry O74 tioner comes here and says he's! — black.” . : oof aoe : James G. Martin, counsel! for the Norfolk & Southern, disagreeing! . with Mr. Heiss, expressing “serious doubts” abou diction in! the Tunstall case, but argued also’ that neither was there jeanne invelved, fasue in 7 t 4 e any Federal ws + RON Se’ ST nt dats segment es, aeie seeing 2" ak = ere pa ee we a ALL roe HEREIN (3 UacLASOUED MATT m 2. wa nv... _. as a fe DAIE 2-81-29 py 20a tient bool ies t On. Not KECK Dit) woy 16 {944 Wiwvt iw ——— i —— This is a clipping from page ___ 7 of the New York Times Tor d tf ov ov. 7: Glipped at the oeat of - ~
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 64
Jump straight to page 64 of 77.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the Cold War & Communism archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
Related subtopics
Daily Worker
5 documents · 305 known pages
Subtopic
I Was a Communist for the FBI Motion Picture
3 documents · 76 known pages
Subtopic
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg
2 documents · 178 known pages
Subtopic
Life Status Research List
2 documents · 889 known pages
Subtopic
Ali Hasan Al Majid Al Tikriti Chemical Ali
1 documents · 53 known pages
Subtopic
Cpusa-Negro Quest
1 documents · 98 known pages
Subtopic