Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 5
Page 63
63 / 77
yo
Two Negroes
OntTah Rine’
Wit wv Asis
/.
WASHINGTON, Nov.
““Aqunstall and Bester Willi
(-]
southern: railroads, — appeared
through counsel before the
La
mm
are
|
reme Col oday and argw@t
Paat. while f of Lo-
jcomotive Fire G
F
FEPreseNtet ait tie Tremen on thé
two systems as exclusive bargain-
. even made agreements with the
jand unemployment for Negro fire-
men.
i
™ Government, through Charles
AN Fahy, Solicitor General, and Rob-
the Attorney General and the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board, in-
tervened as “friends of the court.”
:
Stern argued that, since the unton
2 excluded Negroes from member-
. \ahip, it was “obviously not acting
‘in. good faith as the representative
ot e entire craft.” ;
| The two firemen requested a
‘union represent all employes fair-
agreement with the carriers and
their positions. _
\ | Attorneys for the brotherhood
-ville & Nashville and the Norfolk
eral Court had no jurisdiction In
| Act and that, in the Tunstall ac-
tion, the union had not been prop-
erly served. ns . 7
Charles H. Houston, attorney for
the two firemen, maintained that
uhder the principle of majority
rule the majority could not use the
Government te exploit the minor-
¥, ,
However, he said, the union, act-
ing for the entire class or craft of
firamen undar the provisions of the
Railway Labor Act, had, on Fein
28, 1041, made an agreement with
& groyp Southern roads that
not more 50 per cent of the
firem gentority district
3 1 iT} .
CUA PINE nc.
TST. Pes
De
r
By LOUIS STARK
Special to Tax New Tore Traxs.
eames,
€lto appear before a body composed
ing agents, it barred Negroes and) niong which bar Negroes.
Supporting this plea, the Federal G,,
a LL. Stern, special assistant to|,,
In a joint brief, Mr. Fahy and Mr. broader than race and that if
ldeclaratory judgment that thel®
that petitioners be restored t6/vernely affected had recourse to
‘and for the two roads, the Louis-/tne courts.
ae: Rate a
TET
nated as “non-promotable’ and
this meant that the places of the
Negro firemen, deapite long senior-
ity, would be taken by white fire-
men of lesser seniority.
According to Mr. Houston, if a
Negro fireman tried to bring a
ase of discrimination before the
adiustment board he would have
partly of employers and partly of
Therefore, he told the court, un- |
carriers that resulted in demotlon)iogy the firemen could go to the!
courts for relief they had been!
placed in “economic servitude” by .
ngress, which passed the Ratl-|
way Labor Act. |
The justices expressed a lively:
terest in the case and asked the!
attorneys many questions. i
In reply te one question, Mr.:
Houston said that the issue was.
the
unfon could bar Negroes today it
could “bar Catholics, Jews and sbc
feet, men tomorrow.” -
_ Harold O. Helss, counsel for the.
brotherhood, asserted that Con-
oases did nat lecislate on the rela-!
tion of ‘employes “and their ‘yepres:
sentatives under the Railway La-|
‘ly, that an injunction be issued arty
‘againat enforcement of the union bor 4 tra erie the co
He declared that employes ad-
the National Mediation Board and
Tee oS ene tee
the adjustment board as well az
“Can promotable men be black ?”
Southern, asserted that the Fed-lagked Justice Frankfurter.
“Not on the railroads of the
the case, that the proper remedy |railroads of the United States,” re-
wan before the National Mediation | plied Mr, Hates.
Board or the adjustment board|icy of the roads. We have nothing
created under the Railway Labor! to do with it,” : .
“That ia the pol-
“Then the fdea of the
motable men is based
asked Justice Murphy. oe
“That's rallroad policy,” the
brotherhood attorney answered.
sty said that hundreds of “senior-|[.
the:
difference between these and the
non-pro-
on races?”|)
aA
Tunstall case was that “the pet!-j
ae
Qry
O74
tioner comes here and says he's! —
black.” . : oof aoe :
James G. Martin, counsel! for the
Norfolk & Southern, disagreeing! .
with Mr. Heiss, expressing “serious
doubts” abou diction in!
the Tunstall case, but argued also’
that neither was there
jeanne invelved,
fasue in 7
t
4
e
any Federal
ws
+
RON
Se’
ST nt dats segment es,
aeie seeing 2" ak
= ere pa ee
we
a
ALL roe
HEREIN (3 UacLASOUED
MATT m 2. wa nv... _. as a fe
DAIE 2-81-29 py 20a tient
bool ies
t
On.
Not KECK Dit)
woy 16 {944
Wiwvt iw
———
i
——
This is a clipping from
page ___ 7 of the
New York Times Tor
d
tf
ov
ov. 7:
Glipped at the oeat of
- ~
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic