Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 5
Page 7
7 / 77
at
aA 1388 id
geerets act while a member of the
¥ Supreme Cour Cour}
In Kent Case
' én his own behalf with the consent
sked to Act
By the Aispcigted Prose .
An effort to bring about the re-
to the United States of Tyler
t, convicted in a British court
of viclating the British official war
American Embassy staff in London,
was begun in the Supreme Court
yesterday by Kent's mother, Mra
Ann H. PyKent of this city. ’
The effort was in the form of aj
motian for permission to file s
petition for a writ of mandamus.
Don M. Harlan of Detroit, attorney
for Mrs, Kent, said the writ, if
granted, would call on President
Roosevelt to ascertain the causes|
for Kent's detention, and if he were
wrongfully held, to demand his re-|'
lease. If the demand met with un-
yeasonable delay, Harlan said, the)
President would be required to use
“all acts short of acts of war” to
effectuate the release.
Harlan said the petition qu
joned the right of the State De-|
ent to waive immunity
ent. He contended that “the Cen-
tution follows the flag,” and that
nt was under the protection of
the Constitution while employed as|
a clerk in the American Embassy.
In order to be released to the
British, Harlan contended, Kent
would have had toe waive immunity
of the United States Government.
Harlan also contended that
Kent’s imprisonment in Britain, in
the.light of the State Department’s
recent public announcement of the
ease, constituted a threat of double
jeopardy for the same asserted of- |
fense,
Mrs. Kent said she was in fre-|
quent direct communication with!
her son, She said she had written
him about “efforts to smear his
character” in this country, and
that he had replied that such ac-
tions demonstrated that United;
States authorities “fear the facts.”
Mrs. Kent previously asserted
the State Department's statement
ef the case left unanswered “the
point on which the American peo-| |
ple demand an investigation, i. e.,
the existence or nonexistence of
secret prewar agreements made by
the President without the advice
and consent of the Senate." She
stated her son was required to h
e “secret agreements betwen
sevelt and Prime Minls{er
hurchill.” .
The Supreme Court will mvet
tober 2 to open its new term,
7
Vv
INDEXED Y_--
“tof
NOT SE wD
87 SEP 19 1944
This is a clipping from
page__5 sof’ the
mee a: ror PFE Af
Clipped at the Seat of
Government.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic