Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 6
Page 89
89 / 108
“ .
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE '
WASHINGTON, D. C. CE
Becerber 14, 1932,
DEPAATIDIE CIRCULAR NO, 2547
7O UNITiID STaTss ATTORNEYS
of
Your 2ttention is invited to the decision of the Supreme Court
of the United Stetes in the ease of Jack Gebardi and Louise Rolfe
aeterdi, Petitioners, vs, The United States, Wo. 87, October Term,
Seta ing
A
1952, involving 4 econsnirsey to violate the vibjte Slave Traffic Act,
in which the Court held that a woman, by consenting to fo and volun-
terily soinz from one state to another with a man, with a view to |
immoral relations with him, does not viclate the consrivacy statute,
Seetion SC, Title 18, United States Code, and that in such case the
men cannot be cuilty of consriracy unless he conspires with some per-
{ sen other than the tomas,
Will you please, therefore, give careful consideration to the
ebove mentioned decision in dealing with White Slave Traffic cases
now or herestter pending under Section Gh, Title 16, United States
Code?
respectfully,
WILLIAM D. MITCHELL,
Attorney Ganeral,
COPIES DESTROYED
$382 JAN 21 1965
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic