Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 6
Page 98
98 / 108
- 3.
if the decision iteelf remains unchanged.
On June 9, Justice Roberts signed a stay pending action of the Court
on the petition for rehearing. This petition will be heard by the Court in
the fall aesaion which begina on October 1.
Special Senate Committee on Taxation. Partly as the result of these
foregoing developments, the U. S. Senate on June 16 created a special interim
committee to make a thorough study and investigation “with respect to the taxa-
tion, and the exemption from taxation of (1) securities issued by or under the
authority of the United States or the several states or political subdivisions
thereof. (2) income derived from such securities; and (3) income received
as compensation from the United States or from any state or political subdivi-
sion thereof.”
The committee, which is to report not later than March 1, 1939, con-
siste of Senators Austin of Vermont, Logan of Kentucky, and McGill of Kansas
from the Senate Judiciary Committee; and Senators Brown of Michigan, Byrd of Lies
Virginia and Townsend of Delaware from the Senate Finance Committee. Although 7
hearings will undoubtedly be held, the committee has not, on August 1, organized
or announced its plans.
Report of the U. S. Department of Justice. In a report issued only
within the last few weeks, the Department of Justice says, “In Helvering vs.
Gerhardt, the Court made a far-reaching departure from the view thet employees
of the state as well as the Federal government were exempt from taxation.....
The opinion seems broad enough to cover all employees of atate and municipali-
ties.” * This same study atates that the Port Authority decision seems also to
apply to state and municipal ponds.
These, then, are the facts in the immediate background of two Important
queetions concerning municipal officials. Stated again, these questions are ;
(1) whether the incomes of mmicipal officials and employees and from mmnicipal &
bonds should be taxed by the Federal government, and (2) whether such taxes
should be made retroactive. i
*TItalics ours.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic