◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 7

107 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Feb 22, 1937 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 106 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
Prof, Molvys p&eSe system of internal regulation adopted by a State te preserve public ovdér and te afford protection to its citizens in the enjoyzent of their mek ek ee hee oP mn etater Atéhanesh tie VPadearal favarnneant in said ee ee BS WEEVELS Vi SUNSET Y IS NAP VEs Fa SVU Se Ve we = ie to possess no general er inherent police powers, it may and does exer- cise pewers which correspond te the ordinary police powers of the States im carrying out its delegated authorities.It may preseribe and enforce a penalties for violations ef its laws, but that does net represent a usur- — pation er invasion ef th power ef the States. Therefore, if Congrese - has autherity te create a Federal agency with pewer te arrest and de- liver up fugitives,the exercise ef that pewer would net conflict with | as any reserved power ef the States,unless Congress should attempt te au- = therize the Vaderal agents te make lacal avvrests fer rerely lncal ef- ~ fenses. That situation,however, can be avoited thratigh a cooperative understanding between State and Federal authoritges, under which arrests fer leeal offenses would Ww made by local officials. I believe the above plan has this oavene fy over tis coepera- tive plam suggested by Senater Copeland,viss That Congress has au- thority te designate those whe may arrest and deliver up the fugitive,it | 5 could cenfer that power upon members ef the various State and municipal : { pelice ferees affiliated with the Federal Buream. and thud increase the number ef authorized arresting efficers, This pewer,if it exists, is de- rived solely from the extradition clause,and im my judguent would apply only te fugitives from justice. Others wanted by tie Yederal Covernnent a= would have to be arrested by Federal agents, in the absence of any cone stituticnal provisien authorizing the exercise of such power by State peliee efficials, but the increased number ef officers elegible te arrest fugitives ought te reduce the expense ef the national covernment and at potter the same time multiply the effectiveness of crime detection. Without attempting te state the detaile of legislative remedies, a I believe the extradition clause eof the Constitutiem would suthorise 3. the exercise ef the fellewing powers: eg lste- That Congress may ereate a Federal police agency with sa- therity te arrest and deliver up fugitives from justice to the executive |. authority ef the demanding State, upom tle proef contained in the requi- sition papers,and that such delivery could be made by tle Federal agents 8 § - - without the assent eof tle authorities ef the State where the fugitive is a found. The purpese ef extradition is te enable the demanding State te enforce its lavs,anl its rights are paramoum te those ef the State where the accused is found... 2ud.e If the assent of the executive authority of the State inte ) which the fugitive has fled sheuld be deemed essential or advisable,Com- |. ~ eress could restrict tle extradition preeceedings to the determination solely ef the legal sufficiency ef the indictment or affidavit in charging a crime,and could eliminate therefrom all iseues ef fact, Syrdeo Congress may,if it desires, preserve uhte the States their present power te grant requisitions im proceedings that arise withia the dutied of their lecal efficialg,and my limit the Vederal agente te the arrest and deliv ef the fugitives to the State authoritiés, subject to their actiem upen the requisition demand: 4th.- If a hearing “pon the application should be deemed neces-
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 70
Jump straight to page 70 of 107.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic