Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 8
Page 102
102 / 109
‘Cease? begs
1 cad
. cae - y —
* “>
= 6 mw
Until October 1946 there was no dispute as to the duration of the
contract--that is, it was to continue so long as the Government remained in
possession of the mines, On Cetober 22st the defendants wrote to the
Secretary of the Interior calling for a conference on November lst, to com
mence negotiations regarding wages and other terms and comditions of emloy~
ment, In that letter they contended that the Krug-Lewis Agreement had ine
corporated by reference section 15 of a prior agreement--—the National
hat under section 15
reement of April 1, 1945.—and
of the prior agreement the miners could give notice in writing of a desire
to begin negotiations, ‘and that they could terminate their contract if they
So desired after 20 days of negotiation. This provision of the old agree=
ment was the very provision which had been used by the defendants in bringing
about the work stoppage of April 19246,
The position of the Government was that section 15 of the old agrees
ment was not incorporated in the Krug~Lewis Agreement, and that under the
War Labor Disputes Act the defendants were without power to interfere by
strike or work stoppage with the Government's operation of the mines.
Secretary Krug 60 advised the defendants. He advised them that the Krug-
Lewis Agreement was in full force and effect and that it was by its terms
to continue for the full period of Government possession and operation. He
-
agreed to talk over any disagreements under the contract--and to discuss any
grievances—-advising the defendants that they should apply as provided by law
to the National Wage Stabilization Board if they wished to obtain any changes
et
in the terms and conditions of employment.
On November lst negotiations began-—without prejudice to the conten-
tions of either party as to section 15. The defendants! proposals for changes
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic