Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 8
Page 106
106 / 109
Lae
Tye Bete
the San Francisco Bay Area; did not involve the temporary war powers of
the President; was not an equity suit; and the main issue involved had
alreacy been decided by this Court in the Allen Bradley case. There is
—_——y
3
a 4 +
“a as much analogy between it and this case as there is between a firecracker
} and tie atomic bomb. Counsel do not yet seem to realize that the action
4s
~ of the defendants here fell little short of causing a national disaster.
}
The Cernenters' case was but a ripple in the industrial life of the
’
res
San Trancisco Bay Area,
To return to the case at bar--the District Court granted the relief
prayed ror, restraining the defendants from permitting to remain out~
standin: the notice issued by them on the 15th, or from issuing any further
netice thet the Krug~Lewis Agreement was terminated, or from coercing,
instigating, inducing, or encouraging the mine workers at the mines in
tho Government's possession to interfere by strike, slowdown, walkout,
secsation of work, or otherwise with the operation of the mines. The
defendants were served with the ordor of the Court on the day it was
issuede-jjovember i8th--but they took no steps to recall or vacate their
notice of November 15th. They completely ignored the order of the
United States District Court. On Novesber 20th, a strike in all of the
bitutinous coal mines in the Government's possession went into effect.
yoo Producticn of coal virtually ceased. "The economic creed of UMWA"-=no
7 contract - no work--meant just whet it said.
And 50 on Hovember 2lst, the following day, we realized that Americats
vising the court that the defendants hed wilfully and unlawfully disobeyed
and violated the order of the court. The Government asked for a rule to
Bhow cause why the defendants should not be punished for contempt. The
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic