◆ SpookStack

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No. 12—Ocromraz Tran, 1936. On Wru ef Certinrar; to the United States Cir- i] Motors Corporstion Ch Chevrolet! ear Coart of Appeals ‘ompans, buick “Motor for the Seventh Cirenit. ae gi t [October 26, 1936 } Pea Conus. By thin euit petitioner challenged the valadity under Section 3 of the Clayton Act (3@ Btet. 730, 735, 150. & C. 34) of s previ- sion of the coutrarts made with dealers by srilisg organization ef the General Motors Corporation. The provision in the contract _ between the Chevrolet Motor Company and dealers is an follows: *'Dealer agrees that be will not sell. offer for sake, or vee im the repair of Chevrolet motor vehicles and chassis srrond-hand er weed fhe Chevecict’ Motor Ceaepeey Tt ie ceed te Tearaed Wy the Chevroiet Motor Company. It in agreed that Dealer i» aul Granted any exclumve selling r rights in genuine pew Chevrolet parts or acomenrics.”’ There is @ similar previcion in contracts made by the Baick eompany. The District Court Giemlened the bill of complaint for wast «f equity and its deeree was aired by the Cirent Court of Apprals. 00 F. (3d) 641. Upon the evidence addered ot ibe tris] tle Die. triet Court fourd that the affect of the clause had not been fe any way sabsteatially te leamem vempetition or te ereets » menepely in .. any Une of mere. This foding wes wontainet ky the Cirwah Comet! Appeals, 3d, p. Std. .' ghioh two eburis coneur wulces clear ervar is shown. Stuart v.. , Megdon, 100 0. 6. 2. 34; Poses @ Parikc Retlway Compeng ¥.’ _ Reireeh Comantasion, 33 U. &. £36; Foose & ¥. 0.8 Cov, Belt 1 MEOURDT A mon V ee ae - ‘O- ~ 3! Ped » _ ~ “AL Se .. a a 3 “fF ~. af =z ~ z