Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 8
Page 74
74 / 109
t
_ne Court Ponders
Plea of ‘Tiger of Malaya’
4
!
a
‘Will Rule on Defense Argument That
a Yamashita Should
Have Had Civil Trial
The‘Supreme Court yesterdaytwas absent because “of tllnesa
‘took witer advisement the plea of
‘ Japanese Gen,“~Yamashita, the
Tiger of Malays, that he be re-
turned to his former prisoner-of-
{ war status from that of a war
terlminal sentenced to hang.
,. After a fiveands-half hour
. bearing into the unprecedented
' appeal by an enemy war Jeader to
the nation's highest court, the
seven justices present retired to
deliberate. , .
Hear Contrar; Zleas
With them they took Govern-
ment’s fing] contention that
Yamashita “is guilty of violating
the laws of war” in that he per-
MInitted occupation troops under
his Philippines command to com-
mit atrocities on an estimated 60,-
000 persons, mostly civilians,
And they had the assertion of
defense counsel, three United
States Army officers who defended
the “Tiger” at his recent Manila
trial, that the genere!l “has com-
uitted no crime of any sort."
When Yamashita, languishing
thousands of miles away in Ma-
nila's Bilibid prison, will Jearn
hether his last avenue of appeal
S been granted or denied, is a
atter of speculation. The court
ay Tuie at its next regular Mon-
ay session, January 14, or it may
hand down its decision on Janu-
ary 28, after a two-week recess.
Denies Trial “Illegal”
Assistant Solicitor General Har-
old Judson told the court today
that any cliam Yamashita was
given an iNega! trial because the
war is over, ‘flies in the face of
reason.” ;
- One of the major defense con-
tentions is that the general should
have been tried by « civil court,
since the fighting 1s over.
“Et is obvious that persons who
have offended against the laws of
humanity—from which stem the
laws of war—would in most cases
not be apprebendéd until efter the
fighting is over," Judson said.
“But there still are many Japa-
Rese soldiers not apprehended
‘right in the Philippines. 7 read
‘only the other day that in this
‘sporadic fighting, 15 soldiers,
three. of .them Americans, were
killed.”
Chief Justice Stone and his asso-
jates — Justices Rutledge,
urphy, Frankfurter, Douglas,
lack and Burton—followed the
ts closely. Justice Reed
Page
while Justice Jackson is in Europe,
Virtually every seat in the great
marble chamber was again filled.
Yamashita, Judson said, nog
only was commander of all mili-
tary forces but was nulitary gov-
ernor of the Philippines as well.
He read the original charge
against the Tiger which specified
that he had “unlawfully disre-
garded his responsibilities” and
had permitted atrocities to occur
under his command, “thereby
violating the jaws of war.” These,
the assistant:solicitor general said,
included executions without catise
or trial, tortyre, looting and the
e.
Duty to Be Homane
“Who determines,” asked Jus
tice Rutledge, “whether 6 prisoner
is a violator of the lews of war?"
“The military,” Judson said. H
added that “Yamashita was unde
& Jegal duty to contrat his troo
and to treat war prisoners hu
manely,” and that the Jap genera’
had admitted this during his tria],
From the defense table Capt,
A. Frank Reel got up to present
his brief rebuttal. With him were
Col. Harry E. Clarke and Capt.
Milton Bandberg, all of who flew
from Manila to participate in the
final appeal. :
Relterating thet Yamashita
was improperly tried by the mili-
tary commission, he again raised
the question of jurisdiction and
said that a civil trial should have
been ordered. .
The defense seeks writs of
habeas corpus for Yamashita’s re-
turn .to prisoner-of-war status,
and @ writ of prohibition to fore
stall execution of sentence.
Cites “Parallel” Case
Replying & Question asked
Monday, Reel advised the court
that he had digcovered the casa
of Brig. Gen. Jacob H, Smith,
U.S.A.. who was court-martisied
in 1901 for having ordered atroct-
ties committed against civilians
on Samar Island. He eaid that
Smith’s punishment was “to be
admonished.”
“I take it that your opinion is
that your man should be admon-
ished also?” Justice Stone asked, INDEYE
397 eee —_—- -—"
“Our position, air.” Reel
Plied, “is that our man has com
maltted no crime of any sort, an
I think that it Js a question f
this court to determine.”
Jen Oo 4 gs
N :
WASHINGTON TIMES-HERALD
f
hod
Mr.
Mr.
Mr. eEeg
Coffey _
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
’
‘
i
ras
Tolson
wa
Glavin
Pennington
» Quinn Tam
a
”
fj?
NOT BECORDHD
87 JAN 22 1946
oe
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic