Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 11
Page 67
67 / 114
name aad address
‘ONTROVERSIAL co
fanhattan: The recent Su-
preme Court ruling which threw
‘out -the cases against several
American Communists was «@
good ruling for al! Americans
who believe in freedom of
speech, decency, honeaty and the
Bill of Rights. The Supreme
Court was interested in FACTS
wot in hysterical and lying propa-
ganda, Except for the evidence
of paid informers and profes-
sional witnesses the Government
didn’t have a ingle shred of
evidence that these Communists
advocated any violence against
our Government. The morons
who believe screaming headlines
against American mmunists
sincerely believe that the Com-
munists not only advocated but
actually done terrible things
against the American Govern-
ment. When you ask these bird-
brains for facts they are
stumped. AL SILVERSTEIN.
Manhattan: The recent Su-
preme Court decisions represent
« bright tey of sanity through the
noxious miasma of a decade of
Congreasional inquisition, witch-
hunt hysteria and character assas-
sination, Generation of Americans
to come will remember June 17,
1957, as a great day for democ-
racy and as a palinode for Mc-
Carthyism.
ARNOLD M. GALLUB.
Brooklyn: I note that a cer-
tain self-portrayed “ex -Com-
munist” itorialist, who once
devoted some 400 words to the
“nightmare in Hungary” without
ever using the word Communism,
was one of the firat to applaud
the Supreme Court decisions
which gave American Commu-
nists a field day. LENSMAN.
Brooklyn: Leave unions alone,
says John L, Lewis. So what if
the leaders are stealing from
their suckers? Leave the traitors
free, says Earl Warren. So what
if they do steal our secrets and
give them to their friends? I say
the people elected Congress to
make the laws and the rules.
Who elected John L, Lewis and
the Supreme Court? °-
JOE SMOKQ MEH
ENCLOSU:
es
a a re
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic