◆ SpookStack

~ QUO.VADIS, B © SOURT C ‘ The American people have always accepted the decisions of \ ; ° she United States Supreme Court as the law of the land. We look with guspicion upon anyone who criticizes the Court. The theory that once the Bupreme Court has spoken there is no right 66 eriti- cize, is misleading and a myth. within the Court itself, dissent- ing judges write their own opinions and in vigorous language, criti- cigze the action of their associates, Under the leadership of Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Court has been captured by the “liberal bloc" and this bloc is in complete command, particularly in cases involving civil Liberties, The Court's Fullogs in such cases, together with ite earl‘sr de- cisions in anti-trust regulation and military law, cleraly indicate its philosophical trend, In the "civil liberties" decision, the majority was Chief Justice Warren, Hugo L, Black, William ©. Douglas Barian and Brennan. This quintet has been vigorously criticized by the legal fraternity and by prominent men in high office, Mo critic pre = a of the civil liberties decisions bas been more caustic than one of the members of the Court: Justice Clark. The universal uproar stens from the fact that its rulings have made it difficult and probabiy impossible for the government to prosecute communists, subversives and those persons plotting to overthrow the government by violent } . : mae while never dreamed of even by the accused themselves. What are some of these decisions? What is the explanation for this attitude of our highest Court? What will be the result of this avuncular immunity to subversives? What #111 be the effect upon those eharged with tho apprehension and the prosecution of such criminals? . To what extent is the rampant Liberalism and the mater- falistic,; and seculariatic philosophy, evidences of which have in- filtrated our educational tnstitutions, particularly the academic | colleges and our law schools, responsible for the dilution of our lav and common couse, and productive of the loose Sentinentalisn lately saturating the decisions ender the faith Act, the Watkins fase, the Jencks case and others? fe there the right to eriticize Supreme Court deci- Sions? Recently, 40 an address before the American Bar Association, Senator Javite of few York "begged" the lawyers ¢6 defend against criticizing “the authority aad effectiveness of the United States Suprene Court’, We warned the American Bar, that the Court “stands » in jeopardy of a seriously adverse public reaction" because ‘of sone cement oie