◆ SpookStack

This philosophical doctrin. sas Ot original with Chief Justice Vinson. It was a re-echoing of the philosophy of Holmes, Dewey, Hobbes, Hitler, and Stalin, and of the positivist school, whic’ excludes faith in favor of objective phenomena and demonstrable facts. To say, “There are no absolutes", and that "all concepts are relative" is to affirm that there is no limit to the power of the *tate; that there is no free enterprise as opposed to regimentation; ia.* all decrees shail be subject to the whims of the totalitarian viverelgnty in political ccntrol. Such a doctrine would make Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, right to counsel, certiorari, and inalienable rights, cvkject to the wiil of the political entity in office, and to be disper.ced with if inconvenient to it and at its will. The secularists in education are outlawing religion and furthering the materialistic concept of life as they saturate the minds of youth in schools and colleges. Rabbi Schultz of New York states that, “There are 3,000 college professors who are congenital joiners of Red fronts.” It is significant that a recent poll of the American Sociological Society, members of whom are professors in our colleges and universities, showed the following results: Of the 954 members polled by post card on which was con- tained the questions, "Do you believe in a Divine God? Do you be- lieve in the Durwinian theury of life?" The answers showed that 276 belioved in God as a Personal Ceing; 324 as an impersonal torce; 17s believe in no God and 173 did not know whether God existed (agnostics). The game group voted on social Darwinism as follows: 352 accepted the theory, 380 denied it, and 189 had no comment. Thus, we see that the concept of God as an impersonal force is held by the highest percentage, with believers in God as a Personal Force being next. Over 2/3 of the responses actually indicated no belief ina Personal Being. " Another example of secularistic thinking is clearly il- lustrated by the language of Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Black in the Tidelands case - U.S. v. Texas 339 0.8. 707 and modifiec in 340 0.8. 848, in which the Supreme Court decided against the Claim of the State of Texas to title to lands surrounding ite shores. These two justices in a 4 to 3 decision, expounded the totalitarian principle that what an administration of government believes to be necessary at a givon time is ipso facto right.” This view is Wazrien, Stalinism and certainly not Americanism, It is exactly the #ie8 propounded by a former justice of the Supreme Court, now long gone to his eternal reward, that the law as a function of the power -14-