◆ SpookStack

a e & oa ‘ : Leen. a. - i ‘ ee e 2 sources af eanandnet that we hi mm a re a ee es rTreaUwY Ls mA -15- ' the interception of telephone messages between the defendant and her — ; counsel before and during her trial, if it occured, was nothing more than a serious breach of ethics, since if the intercept ok p the defendant was denied the effective aid and assistance of counsel. Judgment of conviction was affirmed, order denying motion for new trial set aside and case remanded with directions. L'Hommedieu v. Board of Regents (1952) 342 U.S. 951, per curiam opinion, affirmed 30] N.Y, 476, 95 N.E. 2d 806 Plaintiff in three cases sought adjudication that New York's eainhorn law g » Wh of persons who advocated violent overthrow of the government was unconsti- tutional. The state court held it walid. The legislature's finding that subversive groups had infiltrated the public schools and were disseminating subversive propaganda among school] children showed that a clear and present danger existed which justified the exercise by the state's police power to prevent the evil. Sacher wv. United States (1952) 343 U.S. rE _. : During the trial of eleven Communist Party leaders, defense counsel, in the presence of the trial judge and in the face of repeated warnings that their conduct was regarded as contemptuous, persisted in s and that tended to es hee) ae 4 disrupt and delay the trial. Upon receiving the verdict of the jury, the trial judge, without further notice or bearing filed a certificate 5 Loo. under Rule 42 (a) of the Federal Rules of Criainal Procedure sumaarily