Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 17
Page 40
40 / 130
So
TO
FROM
SUBJECT:
8 APR 21970 ae vee
+ aey 1907 £8 1M Pe \t
"Gta GUM, tO. bo, 27 :
OPTINAL IGhm HO. 10 1010-106
Jolson
UNITED STATES GOVEKNMENT een <A TE
idemprandum
aa
JUNE — DATE: December 19, 1969
-1-Mr. DeLoach
1-Mr, Rosen
WIRETAPPING AND .
ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCES
To recommend that Departmental requests for pre-trial electronic
surveillance checks concerning defendants be handled by the Division
recommending and supervising these installations throughout the period
covered by the Department's request.
Recent Supreme Court decisions have held that a defendant is SEE
secure against illegal electrofiic surveillances which monitor his conversations YY) ae
as well as illegal electronic surveillances installed on his premises (home,
office and so forth) regardless of whether he was present or whether he was
monitored (avoids monitoring other persons on his premises and use of such NX :
information in building a case against the defendant). Current Bureau
instructions require written authority from the Attorney General prior to
installation of all such surveillances in accordance with detailed instructions
from the Attorney General. In compliance with court holdings, the Department
routinely requests details of monitoring concerning defendants’ conversations
prior to the time of trial, These requests require all surveillance logs of
conversations in which the defendant has participated, logs of all conversations on
premises in which the defendant has a proprietary interest as well as complete
Getails concerning dissemination of information received from these sources.
7
ay
ORIGINAL CILESS *
Handling by the installing Division retains these highly sensitive
“need-to-know basis'' documents to review by a minimum number of personnel,
Close, continuing supervision is required by the Bureau to insure that
instructions issued by the Attorney General are being fully complied with by ay
the field. This supervision is afforded by the Division requesting the installation.” |
RECOMMENDATION: . oe | |
That these requests be handled by the installing and supervising %
Division rather than the Division responsible for prosecution in order to ingure
prompt, efficient handling : and a greater degree of security in the
sensitive Bay OZ-a7
i ADDENDUM PAGE TWO ‘AND THREE...
Vo 10
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic