Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 18
Page 51
51 / 129
Optoma Wem MO. 18 ; . 3010-106 _ )
mat 1962 boom :
\ . daa Gan, MG. BO. 27 .
. . UNITED STATES C VERNMENT : tee a
J ; . peo, at Inv. i
/7, Memorandum Bite
” IA:
wcanp. Syst,
TO -Mr, T. d. Jenkins pate: 6/18/74 / as. inne
: Z | a _ ~Gen. Inv. _____
mag FROM”: Legal Counsel |, ED bec Cotde: Se. co
; \/ Plen, & Eval. —
Legal Coun.
suBEUT-ADVERSE PERSONNEL ACTIONS-- wr Tromin
UE PROCESS REQUIREMENTS ‘ er
Attached hereto is a copy of an articls which appeared in b¥
the 6/12/74, issue of the "Washington Post," entitled "High Court
Eyes Own Labor Ils.”
O The article indicates that effective 6/10/74, employees of
the Supreme Court were afforded new protections with regard to dis-
3 missal, “Irdeseribes the appointment of an Adverse Action Review
| Committee, the composition thereof, and its faction which includes
t
tha
tne Powe
o overrule or confirm an employee's dismissal.
cd It is significant to note that according to the article, court
7 employees are not part of the Civil Service System, Until now, we
have been fully justified in believing that in the case of an excepted
! agency, due process did not require the institu: ion of any review
— - poard to reconsider dismissals and other seric’is disciplinary ac-
tions, However, the advent of such a review beard for employees
of the Supreme Court bears an obvious inference for other excepted
/
ORIGINAL FILED IN_,~.-
osc agencies. The Supreme Court is the ultimate erbiter of what con-
- “4 stitutes due process, [If it now believes due process requires its
employees to be provided with such protection, we may expect to be
held to the same standard in the future, In thet event, we would be
better advised to institute our own review sysiem structured to the
needs of the FBI, This would avoid the poss/oility that a court
might order the reinstatement of a discharged employee based upon...
ened lack of due process, and also order institution of such a reviev of
_ board, with resultant adverse publicity. : | -. boa
a rs ' a: 4.44 ry “7
1 - Mr. Walsh | 141 .. Net
2 - Mr, Mintz me ware reas
1 ; “ eer
Jo < * “ ° at
(5) ae CONTINUED - OVER ,.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic