Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 21
Page 100
100 / 109
erate gy ¢ em oe
na een Gene iantie
\Why the Supreme Court Decided *”.>
ongressional Investigators Must Stay,”
ithin Limits of the Constitution oe |
Tele, Room __
Mr. Aclloeman_
Miss Gandy__
'The Emergency
t
~. Is Over Vn ibis
By waLredCiremann oe |
: In the Watkins case, the Supreme Cdurt, with
| Chief Justice Warren delivering the opinion of ‘the
| majority, has tried to set down certain limits on the
| rights and powers of congres-
sional investigating committees,
- We must describe the opin-
fon-in this tentative way. For
"| ){-the limitations are stated in
4 || general terms, and no one can
know how they will in the
future apply specifically in con-
crete cases. = - z
In practice, the application :
will depend on how much each }
: partic committee is willing !
‘ to accepi, how much jt is deter~ 1
' mined to stretch the limitations, LIPPMANN ,
and whether the court will be 7
disposed to construe the limitations strictly or loosely.
_ ‘ i
evwspsper: DOSTOs GLODS
Date: 6/27/57
HeAition
autor or
ptitor
Title
' However, we have in the Wat-
kins decision & powerful asser-
tion of a principle which will in-
Suence the conduct of commit- |b. apie to appeal from a congres-;
tees, the attitude of witnesses, i
4 : ional committee to the courts.
j 4, the actions of the court, and the | this, in substance, what Juste:
CSTR Peer OF piloUc opiniony Car, the lone dissenter, seem#[te
hinl}-that for the courts to[fn-
: ,The principle is that a witness,
ervie is a usurpation of poder,
nd that, es a matter of fact, it is
who helievea that his constitu-
not in the public interest that the
tional righty are being ebured,
. may alipeal to the court™ for pro- .
judiciary ahould “supervise” con
gressional investigations,
jtectio=§ 2 .
4
en ek i
“Those who are Opposed to the |
ecision must say that they do
ot think that a witness should |
F
F
Class. or 3
Cnuarceeter:
Page > 30
The question now ore the
country is whether this principle
is constitutional and is in the
public interest 5, 0
INDEXED -72 0 |G2_ 2 %ere
OT RECORDA:
Is PUL 10 1952
ier
aren | TTT eee
6414 15 4057 a |
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic