Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 21
Page 107
107 / 109
KS
—— ao,
, “The Last Straw
ye | By VINCENT — JONES:
upreme Court within the past few Pf.
‘] years can be interpreted-as a fore-
cast of things to come, then Southern f;
«| Senators: fighting the vicious civil...
is rights bill have nothing to fear b-
_y When the measure meets the teat of E..
“the nine men who are such ardent {*
‘| supporters and protector's of the |
i decisions. by by the United zt
| judge “having the authority. to sen-
: tence @ person for contempt without d,
benefit of a jury trial. Will the nine (:
men who have been. s0 liberal nk
their interpretation of a people's
‘nights permit such « travesty of civil
‘liberties? Of course not. |
| What have they done to ef
_, citizens against their’ governments, FY
A _eity, state and federal? Why has the
a.
*
iw
aay
Supreme Court become the self-sty}- te
ed paternalistic father and guardian |.
y of all human Yights, when the Con- H
‘'I stitution specifically lists a Bill of
Rights which acequately provides for @
the protection of every citizen's f
righte?T, 62.0, a
- VY y y>* /
UV " 1 5" a
THE JACKSON PROGRESS~ARGUS ~ *
JACKSON, GEORGIA aye
JUNE 27; 42°! oe wet
DOYLE JONES - EDITOR
ie vont ~" PUBLISHER
” | people’s rights, - cud a
Why the very “idea of a federet ¢, ;
ce but, at the same time, it red
‘
Mr. Mohr
Mr. Parshall 2
. Mr.
Y x Ros 2
In thestield of civil liberties, the J 4% 1. Ter
Court has made many deSfelons of te he
the past few years that have narrow- Mr. Holloman
ed the limits to which local govern- Miss Gandy.
ments can go in interfering. with the
basic freedoms. of their citizens,
-Most historic of these decisions
was handed down in 1954 when
Court moved into the legislative field’
and outlawed segregation in public |
schoole on the ground that segrege-
tion meant discrimination and we.
fair treatment of citizens. The
Court's decision outlawing segregat- my
ed achools was perhaps prompted by *
Congress’ inadility to act in this,
BAUM:
wiped out prior Court decisions,
setting up the separate but equal:
doctrine of schools ‘for Southern {|
states as being fair, honest and prae-
tical. s ,
“.The. “most. Fecéni, and shocking,
example of the Court’s determination
tp, { PEstect the rights, of ita citiaffns
-the feci on high: & wee
per 5 ce Raa
€ spiring th indvocate: _qiolenit sean
ithrow of thes’ governmel s he vz
“ta its rulirig: the High t art found’
that teaching. the” forcible overthrow,
of Rqvernment es “en abstract, pri.
' ciples vorced from any. effort to
| inatigate\ ‘action - ‘to that end” war
Not a. violation of the Smith Act, unh-
der hist the Communists were me
secuted od convicted, "Rie OY
woe ra = Lo
6 JUL "38 :
Hal as
1 ws
=
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic