◆ SpookStack

1 eee a ~f0 correct the ‘detailing the shocking sta: : fles of sex delinquency in public schools, the means of combating this evi Was more sex education in - schools, There was one , Positive force which was - Mentioned—religious training i How would sex education alle F 1 Viate these conditions if not J accompanied by training as to what is right and wrong mor- ally? Couldn't these entidven i attend religious services of their own denominations where , the moral aspects of sexual| promiscuity and its dire conse- quences would be explained to them before they are old , Chough to experiment and ruin . their lives because no one told , them of their danger? : &8 a child, I attended cath- clic parochial schools, where * we were taught that sexual Telations outside of marriage was breaking the Sixth Com- mandment, a mortal ain. We were also taught that we, as children, were responsi ble for the wrong we did, and never thought of blaming ovr Parents or teachers for our misdemeanora. We ought to , add the fourth “R'—yeligion L aet tha training a2) cone i we aay ee OL “ee Gertrude M. Hoyt. Views of High farich {Is there any justlee in the cision handed down by the SipieneCaye a sit is eet sree : - essed ra se ,to commit the seme crime oF ; worse, simply because there “wes a question of time before his srratenment? And wha ts best qualified to judge how, Jong it must take for an ar-/ ‘Taignment to be made? Js it the police who are so dili-- gently working on the case, who are so directiy concerned: with its just conclusion. or is‘ it a political appointee sitting on the bench of our Supreme Court? From two recent de- cisions handed down by the Supreme Court, concerning the FRI files ana the tenn cane, it seema to me there must’ ¢ something dreadfully wrong’ with either our mS, with our Supreme Court. Something should be done—and quic titrertien, a a a ae . tee Tee a4 Pad G4JUL9 1957 | Pa xecent column 1 4 Jam ‘commentator on ~of America in the Communist atruggie by the Supreme Court contains this line, “The jus- tees dienlayw a curinus aware woSs GSEs S ness of the actual operstions of Communist subversion.” ‘ Why should the respectable cloak of jurisprudence be thrown around these raw de- cisions, saying that it's all « _Tnysterious science, beyond the understanding of the simple Yayman who, therefore, is un-- able to judge? Baloney to the line that these are all “honorable men” | tuat tan duh te know whet Rh wer Se aareee they are doling! | Why should not every man who used his power in the: court to throw open the flies. of the FBI to criminals be: impeached? Or why shouldn't} Congress cut off appropria- j tions to the Supreme Court un- til each and every one of the gentlemen who raised his hand _ in favor of this dirty busineas, has moved out? = 9 Theima Tf. Kobinson, MB. : Beverley Hills, Caltf. eek The Supreme Court, in’ ordering the release qf five ; convicted Communists, sald a t that “advocating and teaching ¢ violent overthrow of the Gov- ernment” is merely an “abe j stract principle” and not “con 4 crete action” which the Smith! Act requires. The court did; not trouble itself? ta explain why the teaching of “concrete; actio#” is not inherent in “violent overthrow.” Tf it, meant that there must not only be “teaching” but an ef- fective demonstration of “con- crete action” $0 sustain & con- ' yiction, this would be locking _ the stable door after the horse ‘ia stolen; which’ recalls this | recent item in the conservative British weekly, Time and Tide: " “a Northamptonshire mage istrate who happens also to be manager of a primary school ns task enough ¢o-zek-anpro- spective’ master whether he (9° ger ‘TEPPSHET to be a memberol, chairman immediately ruled the question to be out of order, and ¢ha slave said shernty that anG Gos Cita Sa.8 Sasi Pee Se = such questions must never be _- ae, elmont tT} Mohr traordinary argument begins Rosen again—‘monstrous interference Tamm L “MoCarthyism’ ‘Preedom. _g Totter “lof politica! and religious views" i Nease : .. and so on. In an age of Tele. Room deological wars I should have Holloman Gandy pde yen st NOT RECORDED bandoned the curious theory . that a man’s political and havea nn pet i ote we would by now have eLitennnhinal healiafe PIWJUSUpP ees Mika sere bearing on what he actually does.” . Thla writer apparently was unaware of the fact that in. Ithis country our own Supreme iCourt hag now made this ‘“eurious theory” the law of the wand. This latest decision of the court was simply one more lexercise of its assumed dic- ‘tatorlal powers, from which it cannot refrain even though it gives aid and comfort to our mortal enemy. Like the racial integration decision, by resort ‘to mneologism and its own ! lay “interpretation™ : et rewrites legislation substitute its own pé vs for existing law. . ~ Qld Reactionary. tres - * - Wash. Post and ar aw Times Herald Wash. News Wash. Star Aro N.Y. Herald ._. Tribune N, Y¥. Journal- American N.Y. Mirror N. Y. Daily News —___ N.Y. Times The Worker New Leader 44 JUL 8 1957 See ee ee Daily Worker ee Date JUL 11957 ___