◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 24

55 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Aug 1, 1957 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 55 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
qi it pe ong the audacious and illegal decisions dered by the United States Supreme at its recent session was one depriv- A the states of the right to prescribe quatif- F ong for persona who seek to engage in seca the practice of law. As well said by Senator “7 Jenner, of Indiana, this ig essentially and yy Particularly a local matter, which each state {must be permitted to decide for itself. Yet Supreme Court of the United States, in recent Schware and Konigsberg - cases, agecting applicants for the bar in New Mex- . and California, respectively, denied the ~.4 Tight of a state to require an applicant for -*"Tadmission fo the bar, in the course of being =; {examined ag to hig character and fitness to @ practice law, to answer questions designed - to elicit information about past connections _ » and associations with Communists and Com- ““munjst organizations, and denied the rig’ :, Of ajState Supreme Court ta find that ™ longtime association of an applicant wi ve. | the unist Party, as a member of su arti 7a FL G Pn pe a ~ 65 SEP 11 1957 » 17 Which such jurisdiction should be withdraw Party, was @ proper “tector” to be considered: ” in determining the character and Fitness “ the applicant. : Oo In the words of the resolution offered by . . Chief Justice Norman F. Arterburn of the’ Supreme Court of Indiana, at the recent’ meeting of the Chief Justices of the, State 4 Supreme Courts: - ; “The United States Supreme Court: “has” transgressed sound legal principles, and inf particular, usurped fact-finding functions. . “Moreover, the United States Court hag encroached upon the Jurisdicti of the state courts. .... “Although the United States Supreme Court has the authority to fix its own stand- ards of character and fitness to practice in the Federal courts, we do not recognize nor concede that it may do so for the courts of the several states of this Union.” Tt may be there are other areas tn whi the appellate jurisdiction of the Supre: Court should be restricted or with respect ] Mr. Tictter Mr. Nease _____ Tde, Room____. Mr. Hojloman_. Misa Gandy___. FREDERICK SULLENS, EDITGR JACKSON DAILY NEWS JACKSON, MISS. 18/24/57. Page 6 Cols. 1 & 2 aperk 7 ven (2 s7z fo" ro NOT OT RECORDED Ml SEP id 1950 DT el —e
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 34
Jump straight to page 34 of 55.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic