Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 24
Page 7
7 / 55
0-19 (Rev. 9-7-546)
ti anata FET I SA es Gas ilainps, Dita 74
"Fudic ial Family Rift & Le
~ > One of the more Y enous crititisms
F ef the Supreme Court's performance af 3}
y" its. recent session has come from them:
Which chin hardly be accused i of Partisan ,
_ Gr sectional carping. : 7
+ Meeting In New York ‘a, few dayd:'
ago, the State chief justices expressed ;.
deep concern over the trend o me -*
Gout, decisions in matters bearing upon .
the relations between the States and the |
Badaral actahitchmant Te wnartinniar i
VUE TU LLOLSLL GE Ve Ak EEE WAN Lee g
the State judicial officers were per--'
turbed by two Supreme. Court rulings
Which reversed the highest courts of
New Mexico and California in cases in-
volving the eligibility of applicants to
practice law In those States. “The ques--
tion was referred to a committee com-
Puerto Rico, Ohio and Wisconsin, This
committee, in turn, proposed that the _.
conference state its “... profound con-
cern for the retention and exercise of .
the constitutional powers of State goy- -
ernments,” and recommended the ap- .
pointment of a special committee “to
examine the role of the judiciary as.it .
affects the distribution of Powers be- ©
tween the States and the Federal Gov-
ernment...” Thirty-two of the 42 chief
| justices present indorsed this proposal.
'
iF:
%
~‘.
3 Criticism of this sort, coming from.
chie? justices representing all sections -
of the country, is not something to be
whrushed aside. For the highest judicial.
Giiicers of the States would not indulge.
lightly or capriciously in criticism of the,
highest judicial officers: of the Federal
aystem. The report of this special coms
thittee, if it follows the line of discua-.s
the
. aor at the New York meeting, may WE.
exercise a substantial restraining infu’
ce on the’ ‘tendency of the Supreme %
; to whittle down, in decision after
aught the “powers which had been’ *
nueht ta reside in the States "2°
Sees” ane sob AS Ale
FR te BIB,
mae
1
. 93
1 JOLI95F
HRA = ed eee
posed of thé chief justices of Maine, - -
Massachusetts, Arizona, South Carolina,. -
ifr
am
Gr obi
Mohr
Parsons
Rose
Tamm
Trotter
Nease.___
Tele. Room
Holloman
Gan
Cz. a18 EA
NOT WOT RECORDED
138 (QUL 31 19a
ee
—_
Wash. Post and
Times Herald
Wash. News
Wash, Star
WN oY U.e-1
aMe 24 FIG
Tribune
N. Y, Journal-
American
N. Y. Mirror
N.Y. Daily News
N. Y. Times
Daily Worker
The Worker
Naw ft s-J.-
Se
EZ
Bel em ie
we
NGW Léqo0er
Date __ Il 27 1957
oF ees
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic