Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 25
Page 37
37 / 55
0-19 (Rev. 10-29-57) C . “pce 3
Tolson e-
Boardma oy
oty Belmont
| ' Four-to Fou rn
. gr <The four-tofour decisibn of Yhe Supreme Court
: fn thé Alfonse Bartkus case leaves the law. in
~regard to conflicting decisions by Federal and
| state juries im a state confusion. The effect
of the even split in the-Stiipreme Court is to up-
hold the rulings of the Iitols courts sustaining
the conviction of Bartkus for bank robbery even
| though a Federal jury had acquitted him of
“ charges growing out of the same crime. But the
question whether a state conviction after a Fed-
eral acquittal amounts to placing the defend-
ant in double jeopardy thus remains even more
controversial than it was before.
Fortunately, the Court will have another go at
the problem, for it has agreed to review a similar
case involving a Federal conviction after a stats
conviction for the same crime. Here the issue
may be more clear-cut, for the double jeopardy,
if there is any, appears to have been a direct
result of Federal action, and the Fifth Amend-
ment prohibition against putting a person twice
‘in jeopardy for the same offense operates directly
against the Federal Government. \ It is to be hoped
w
that the entire Court will be able to sit on this ‘
case and that a more decisive ruling may be
forthcoming om
It is possible, however, that no comprehensive
or general Tule can be laid down when the double-
jeopardy plea involves separate Federal and state
- trials. No doubt it would be double jeopardy if bz 2.7! 4 Sis
wo , , * Federal jury convicted a person of precisely Z. E
. ‘ the same crime for which he had already been NOT NOT RECORS
: convicted by.a state. But state and Federal laws 138 gon 16 1958
‘ are seldom identical, and it is quite possible that
an offender may be guilty under the state law a werent, Post and
but not under the Federal law, or vice versa. If — Times Herald
: a kidnaper transported his victim from Maryland Wash. News
. to Virginia, for example, he might be convicted Wash. Star
a. of Kidnaping In Maryland even though a Federal .
jury might not find sufficient evidence to convict N. Y. Herald
him of taking his victim across a state line. | Tribune
Because of the great diversity of Federal and N. Y. Journal-
state laws this question may be in litigatiqn for American
a long time, but a full Court can certainly make N.Y. Mirror
it glearer-than it is today. . —_—_—_—_—— N. Y. Daily News —
N. Y. Times
Daily Worker
The Worker —____
New Leader
Date Jin 8
G2IEW 171958
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic