◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 25

55 pages · May 11, 2026 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 55 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
..___ ENFORCE THE “LAW! Bh “By DAVID LAWRENC Supreme ©, Ww THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE started in the 19308 to enforce vigorously the Prohibition laws enacted under’ the 18th Amendment, the American people soon demanded repeal. In less than ten months control of tiquor sales was vested in the States, _Today, after nearly four years, the edict of the Supreme Court of the United States ordering segrega- “tion banned im the public schools hes not been en- “forced throughout the country—even in the North—eo ae to accomplish the purposes set forth by the Court. For en May 17, 1954, ~the supreme law of the land” regation of children in public schools solely on the besis of race, even though the physical facilities and other ‘tangible’ factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? We believe that it does.” The Court went on to stress the importance of “in- ‘tangible considerations,” such as “ability to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students,” and then added: “To separate’ them from others of similer age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the commu- mite that eraser aWant tease hearts on eine fee were easly Mehmet Tey GEC It CEES GG MminGs i a way unlikely ever to be undone.” Relying on that decleration, the Chicago branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People complained recently that in that city only 9 per cent of the elementary schools are mixed facially, that 70 per cent are predominantly white, that 21 per cent are predominantly Negro, and that, as a consequence, “90 per cent of Chicago public-elemen- tary-school pupils attended de facto segregated schools.” In New York City the situation is best de- scribed in an article in the New York Times by its education editor, Benjamin Fine, who writes: “The majority of children attend schools of their own ethnic group. Although integration is now one of the ‘cardinal principles’ of the School Board, three out of four pupils go to a school that is in effect segregated. These are either schools where Negroes are in the vast majority, or where the white children are concentrated. Most of this is caused by residential patterns. “Despite consistent urging by the Urban League, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored pas i 116 bien _ pupils are Negroes is not properly “integrated” and that - People and other groups, little change has taken place in district lines for elementary schools. A central ron- ing unit, authorized by the Board of Education several months .ago, is still little more than a paper agency. . The unit has received $100,000 to study soning lines and change them where necessary to help integration.” The Times writer goes on to say that “it is doubtful that complete integration—if by that term is meant the tion is insistent “that the principle of neighborhood schools remain intact.” . But what of the rights of the Negroes under “the \ a law of eh. 1.2.7 to mnjoy mee nd educational opportunities,” regardless of residence? New York City’s School Superintendent in a recent report said that 1,500 children are being taken short distances by bus from one school to another, to relieve “t- overcrowded conditions and incidentally to help in- N tegration. . What about the Negro pupils, however, whose par- . ents are willing to pay bus fares over @ long distance * to a white school and secure the advantages to which the Supreme Court says the Negro children are en- titted? How long can the subterfuge of “residence requirement” be maintained in the face of the declara- \g tion by the Supreme Court that no Negro student can = oromer mation unless merited! ta atten =z get the proper education unicss perinitted to attend a = white school and mingle with white children? Negto leaders in New York City argue that any New York school in which more than 40 per cent of the —_fe a af ‘to achieve a “racial balance” each school should contain about 15 per cent Negroes, since about 15 per cent of New York’s 1,300,000 public school pupils are Negroes. It follows that every public school in the United States—-in order to carry out the doctrine enunciated by the Supreme Court—must have in it a uniform peo- portion of Negro students based upon the population ratio of that city or area. Gh AIGES - f Supreme Court had ruled’ that “separate educations facilities are inherently yaiedual."358° When will “the supreme law of the land’ be en- forced? ; The_quickest way to get “repeal” of the Supreme Court decision is to enforce the so-called “law.” The people will act when they fully understand that the States are being deprived by federal authority of their right to control and regulate their own schools. ORIGINAL COPY FILED N . $. NEWS & WORLD REPORT © FEBRUARY 14, 1958——— "|
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 51
Jump straight to page 51 of 55.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic