Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 26
Page 100
100 / 116
19
BOUUL 98 1958
it placed a set of legal handcuff, on
every law enforcement officer in the
nation, including those of Federal
agencies, re
A nullifying bill sponsored "by
Louisiana's Representative EpwiN
WILLIS hag been passed by the House
by: a vote of 294 to 79 and the public
safety requires that it be given equally
swift and effective support in the
| Senate. . Co,
The “Mallory Decision.” aa much of
a handicap to prosecutors as it is to
| investigators, got ita name from the
| case of ANDREW R. MALLORY, a Negro
rapist who had been convicted and
sentenced to death for the assault on
{ & Washington white woman. There
was ample proof of hig guilt but a
Supreme Court majority threw out -his
and arraignment. |
The court ruled that arrested per-
sons must be arraigned “as quickly
88 possible” after arrest. It left
margin whatever for a usually necef-
sary pre-arraignment investigation,
eriod in which a case ean often
made” or lost. . an
The Willis Bill, which the House has
pproved, specifically seta out that
statements and confessions, other-
wise admissible, shall not be inadmis-
against the lawa of the United States.”
It protects the rights of the accused
cers warn him in advance that any
statement made by him can be used
made without such a warning having
The Jencks and Mallory decisions
than any other two in the Jong his-
Jencks decision provided @ means for
confidential files. It opened a prison
door for many. The Mallory decision
prevents the door from ever being
osed on some, |. | , ee
rength to a law enforcément arm
thered by Judicial unreality and ultra
AK ee el
When the Supreme Court majority
made its capricicds "MEatSPy Decision: '
J] conviction on the ground that police |
had held him too long between arrest ;
1 sible solely because of delay in taking |
an arrested person before a commis- j
sioner or other officer empowered to-
commit persons charged with offenses |
by requiring that interrogating offi- 1:
_aa evidence against him, Statements |.
been given are to be held inadmissible |!
as evidence. L ye i
have done more injury to public safety
tory of Federal jurisprudence, The |.
criminals to have a look at the FBI's |.
The Willis Bill will restore some |:
Tele. Roon
Mr. Holloman_—
Miss Gandy
THE COMMERICAL APPEAL
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
7-3-SE
f
L
Veak
rome!
i
SEARCHED
SERIALIZED........... FILED
JUL- 8 1958
FBI - MEMPHIS
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic