Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 26
Page 58
58 / 116
i 0-29 (Rev. 10-20-57)
[reaay tn in n National 4 Attairs Bae Z
. €s8 Bikes re Court ”. mut a
“On ee ot Ce
ee By DAVID Lawitence =< }é
is “WASHINGTON, May: 4.—Attorney General
| Roser had his baseball metaphors mixed up. He says the
being considered in Congress to curb the excesses of the Bu- bla inaccuracies inher
preme Court are the result of the same sort of outcry heard
‘from spectators at a _ baseball game who shout, “Kill the? eer nonetheless tale "OF Yb iioman ——
;umpire|” Pn | Se ow Tyce ah eae . ? ye say that the political cast Gandy
a « But what the ‘eritics of the Supreme of the clerks as a group w
Court really want is for the “umpire” to to the ‘left’ of either the nation
stick to his job of watching the ball and or the cour. ©0975
, abiding by the rules, They don’t think it’s “Some of the tenets of the
"the, umpire’s duty. to make nem, rules, or f rome point of view whi
e manager of the club, for in- ae
_ stance, just when he-can put in a dif- commanded 1 the eympathy ct &
ferent pitcher. They don’t lke to see an Woe: extn ijeltude for the
' gutside the foul line, it is a Youl for one erimtnal defendants expansion
.team, but when the other team hits the of Federal power at the expense > /7
i ball into exactly the same spot 1t isn’t a po planar ail {4 27 rs GS 7
‘foul at all. In other words, the fans don't bas
joi state power, great sympathy § =| (7
\\Gowara any government reg-
‘ation of business—in shorh
want to see the umpire moving the Toul
line around to suit himself.
That's e ally what the dispute is
about as thé-Supreme Court ignores’ the vs
rules of the game —repestemy and make: ' Lawrence
NOT RECORDED
126 MAY 16 1958
fda noe _ — \ a ee -
Up its Own rules that are then procjaimed as binding on every-j . the —_—_— —
body—-even to the point of telling Congress what questions| = - j Surely | the nena enimine
may be asked in formal hearings through which its commit-!- . Dni hole law-clerk system to
tees seek to get information to guide them in writing new laws.] | - the enn Ine whether ‘perhaps
_]| Also, in a baseball game “clerks” should be given
| so-called “intellectuals.” The “ these tns-
pie fh He appears im ual unin [oFile aad: °° 60s | Sumpe st istantsutioes
er n, “gen .
form and be hee Tule DoOk| agit their respective Justices| | Pethaps.naleadof leting oom
Court's work it isn’t always)‘ searching the law books and] . a oaaghould provide pe permanent
possible to know who the um-,%ther sources for materials} . ear ta to the justices and
pire happens to be... {relevant to the decision of cases} ~ dscistanta’ among their quall-
| Thus every justice has two[efore the court... s+: |* | Fettions should be actual ex
. 2016 CICTES GIVEN Present with, the ben in -_
few clerks, and the chief JU5lrutts of their searches to thelr}: | Peraen* por if the “law cler
don’t have to be confirmed by|/Ustices along with their recoms- f° play such @ “tal part in ©
the Senate. ‘Thay are not sup-|Zendations. They go over drafts}: ‘making of the “supreme law ;
posed to be judges, Yet they Ohaoes Ther tena te eit 3 |e fang somey the Wash. Post and
‘ibe Supreme ‘Court Justices °F, Beir justees, arid tale of |i Commitiey as t0| Times Herald
eaperialy in conn sae ite ot talk is mostly about, law and Tea of their “judict Wash News
rtiorari.” Thesé ate petitions|S%e 8 ov 7" Wash. Stan I 7
to the Supteme Court to grant “What is more important, the eITrETA Y. Herald Tribina N.Y. Herald
appeal from the lotver|*#y to the justice's mind was Trikune 4
courts. If the writ is denied,|#!ways oper. There was-always N. Y¥; Journal
there's no appeal. It means a/@™Meone—fresh fram the im- we Ne oe
fina! judielal decision so far as mersion In ideas that marks American
the citizen is rhed. * e ” ,
justice himself signs the denial(eer——Polaed. at the Justice's | N. Ys Mirror
le the writ, but the basic udg-|@0¥. willing and able to do Nz. Daily News —
: preced a tt
H pent which _pas . receded In ‘baseball, anybody making . N Y. Timea
ovis WWellwe SERS Fe ge
clerk imbued ‘with ‘all sorts of|decisions ‘on the field of ‘p
ideas as to the role of the|must appear in uniform as an
Supreine Court, bat the nation umpire and has to be seent
: a mks . There are no invisible unplres.
i * Suat a “week” ‘3g0,. | New Certainly when a lawyer
} York Times,” ‘fn ite Sunday largued his case and submitted
gazine, had an article by allt to the Supreme Court jug.
Daily Worker
The Worker
New Leader ————_—-
‘ormer law clerk to a Supreme tices, he. ought, to have. oe » Date
‘court justice who ‘discussed |right of rebuttal against an
frankly the role played by|pew.. points raised by . ‘ta MAY5 1958
ty pista ch clerks, many of whom clerks,” especially some .
a. raven? BAW, Pak AY Sor rarin ne im- ie re remarkable. apeotes
_—
‘
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic