◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 26

116 pages · May 11, 2026 · Broad topic: Politics & Activism · Topic: Supreme Court · 108 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
j The Supreme Court i Should Be Curbed __ The Senate Judiciary Committee has re- gq ported favorably by a vote of 10 to 5 a bill to limit certain types of Supreme Court jur- M isdiction—-authority to do so being specifi- g|cally vested in Congress by the federal Con- :# (stitution and spelled out in detail in that £ |document. 2 _ ¥i The bill would stop the Supreme Co ¥ from overturning a state’s decision on what lawyers can practice in state courts—the Court having ruled that a stale could not {bar a Communist from practicing as a law- yer. : oo , ; - The measure would take away from the Supreme Court authority to determine what questions Congress can ask of witnesses _ through its committees, the Court also hav- *.. ing stepped into this field with limitations = which could destroy effectiveness of con- gressional committee investigations into sub- :. q version, espionage, treason and similar jfields.' .\. os The bill also would restore to the -=-4 the power to set up their own laws a ates inst bowndaries—a power nullified by a recent Sugireme Court decision. © ~——Ss- gress to pass a law against advocating over- throw of the federal government—a law which would have teeth which could not be pulled by the Supreme Court. This has be- come necessary because the Supreme Court has ruled that the Smith Act is valid in pro- g@ hibiting advocacy of overthrow of the fed- # eral government by violence but that it is J invalid if this advocacy is presented onl in what the Court considers a ‘‘theoretica manner. The result. is that the Supreme B28 Court virtually has nullified both the Smith own previous approval of the: Act and its Certainly there is obvious need for con- in the bill approved by the Judiciary @om- mittee. Yet, in widely separated part of the\country there is vigorous oppositiog to the Wneasure and almost all of it seems to -be built on the same foundationless cry—. | at those advocating the . I. i ees the Supreme Court because thay-hap-"” ‘J subversion and sedition within their jown j he bill further would authorize Con- + aad bll¢ e trying to } pen to disagree with some of its decisions. - ~ A few days ago, in reporting the Senate® Judiciary Committee’s action,«TV news, broadcaster David. Brinkley said that this measure was “dreamed up by Senator Jen- ner” of Indiana. To some viewers he seemed to feel that one should go through some spe-~ cial asepsis, at least figuratively, before as- sociating with Senator Jenner even orally. uch widely known newspapers as the Washington Post and New York Times in the East, the Denver Post in the Rocky Moun- tains, the Minneapolis Tribune in the far horth, and various others of the same so- ciological stripe editorially, have taken up the cry that Senator Jenner or Senator East- land or somebody else has put over the bill ‘because they “disagreed” with Supreme Court decisions. Fortunately, some equally | _important papers—such as the Cleveland: | Plain Dealer and the Los Angeles Times supt | port the principle of a congressional curb orf! the Court, - a Actually, disagreement with Supreme Cdurt decisions of the type which would be curbed in the Judiciary Committee bill is espread and includes éommittees and ast presidents of the American Bar Asso- iation as well as eminent students of con- titutional law, federal judges, and others. The Senate Judiciary Committee bill and the original Jenner bill to curb the Supreme Court are about as unlike as a cat and a dog. The Jenner bill was, to all practical pur- ' poses, scrapped almost before it got out of swaddling clothes. The Butler bill was sub- stituted and now the Senate Judiciary Co mittee has substituted a bill of own for the Butler bill. It's rather af cry to attribute a bill approved by 10 out - i { gressional action of this type—and proh-+ ably for considerable more action in rela- tion to the Supreme Court than is included - SO MAY 26 1958 _ Mr. T. ter__ Mr. Clayton, Tele. Roum _ Mr. ‘Holloman __ Miss Gandy__ >. a 1h eee a) yo DON EWING, ASSOCIAT EDITOR THE SHREVEPORT TIME SHREVEPORT, LA. 5/10/58 Page &§ A Col. 1& r « q_ 27st A A —_—— Lat NOT RECORDE aA WAY 23 1958 ae oe -
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 68
Jump straight to page 68 of 116.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the Politics & Activism archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
federal bureau letter
Related subtopics
J Edgar Hoover Appointment and Phone Logs
42 documents · 3899 known pages
Subtopic
American Friends Service Committee
39 documents · 2906 known pages
Subtopic
Senator Edward Kennedy
33 documents · 3523 known pages
Subtopic
ACLU
26 documents · 191 known pages
Subtopic
J Edgar Hoover
24 documents · 1926 known pages
Subtopic
Billy Carter
20 documents · 688 known pages
Subtopic