Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 27
Page 23
23 / 83
Ptret“aWestions (thus abo
A A
‘torle power’ of to rule on
‘ tinency); tevive al ciate antidedition. on.
‘Jaws struck down. by the Nelson deci-
sion, and make unist prosecution
. easier by rede Smith Abt terms
_ Which the Court read Rarrowly in
- the Yates case last vaar
oo i ro
iw
. W. Smith {D-Va.), author of the Smith
- gtates, or unless there is
wa ~
. Acts of Congress,
— ea
| The Senate Democratle enter iD Te
fused to call up the Jenner-Butler bill
for debate. It sat on the. Senate | foor
iike a time bomb for more than. three
mon
MEANWHILE, ON’ the “House aide
Judiciary Chairman Emanuel Celler
(D-N. Y.) was sitting on HR 3, which as
its number indica
early on the first day of the 1957 ses-
sion. Fhe Jenner bill took the hardest
direct poke at the Court, but if the
opponents’ prophecies were correct, HR
3 would have had more far: Teaching
effects, —
HR 3 was introduced by. Rep. Howard
to prosecute subversion against the
Federal Government, The Court had
struck down the state sedition laws in
the Nelson case because it decided that
Congress had intended to give the Fed-
eral Government exclusive jurisdiction (7
in the field by passing the Smith Act.
Smith's bill said that no Act of Con-'
gress should be constried as pre
empting a field unless it specifically so
such a con-
flict between state and Federal laws
that they cannot stand together,
Opponents sald that the bill would
curb the Court’s role of interpreting
More portant,
“since the bill was retroactive they
, feared that it might strike down or at
” least cause_endless litigation over Fed-
’ eral
_ where uniformity
rograms in areas
-essential, -
Congress rarely writes a specific pre-
_ Tegulatory
' emption clause into a bill. Had HR &
become law, opponents sald, it might
have undone 156 years of Federal reg-
ulation in every field and let the states
set their own rules. Celler said it would
“take us back to the Articles of Con: |
federation.” The Justice Dee :
shuddered at the thought of the bill
becoming law. . \ ‘
The Smith bill was finally blasted-,
past Celler to the House floor where
it was passed easily in July and was
sent to the Senate, The Senate . Judi-
clary Committee struck out the retro -
-active feature and sent it to the floor.
where it sat beside the Jenner-Butler’
; bil. .. a eee
.
‘
laws. Still another was the M
eee
Sf ed "te
‘BOTH HOUSES were also consider.
‘ing more limited s bills which simply”
would have revived the state sedition
shtery-Ditl
Sa ee Cn ae ae 1]
s was introduced ’
(thus abolishing-rarm. pRWTgIGN” that arPagnmene
Jalone would not be grounds t to dnvalh,
; date a confession..- ;
eet.)
Seen ton
that delay in
Pal
+
7. Finally “on the waccaag before’
tthe Saturday night adjournment, Sen-’
“ate Majonty Leader Lyndon B. John-.
Hed on tha Mallors hill far da: iH
Sent oe ——~ ema,
‘bate, It was ; passed and sent to confer- |
i ence with the House by ‘a vate of 65-12. |
Jenner got his bill before the Senate
_ Wednesday by offering it as an amend: |
7
ee) Gpog Ghowaogesis siwup cua -
ae"
fe homie mak
‘ment to a minor bill which had been. '
made the pending business. .
The floor fight against the Jenner: | ;
Butler bill was led by Sen. Thomas C.
Hennings Jr, ()-Mo.) and Sen. John A. —
Carroll: (D-Colo.). _Hennings said that .
the real purpose of the Bill w was to “visit -
retribution upon the Supreme Court for ;
some of its past decisions and to put a |
foot in the door in anticipation of future <
attempts to strip the Court of its Juris: :
diction whenever there is disagreemen i
with its decision.” si. od
. The Jenner bill was killed, 49-41, ‘on |
a motion to table it, which means to
postpone action indefinitely. Hennings"
hinted broadly that the liberals would |
aye a filibuster if the bill wasn't, set |
THEN: THE Nelson. bill was brought
fe and Sen. Sonn L. MecCiellan (D-Ark}
fered HR'3 as an amendment. Ca. '
i's motion to table it was bea
46-38. Johnson promptly forced the |
Senate to adjourn overnight while he |
tried to pull things together. . \
After a day-Iong debate. Thursday |
and nimble work in the cloakrooms by |
Johnson, the Senate voted, 41-46, to
kill HR 3 by sending it back to com-
together, the Nelson bili went with it.
But the last straw for the Court oppo-
nents was that even the Mallory bill
flopped in the closirtg minutes of the.
session, after it had been guided
through conference and was repassed
by the House. Thede'a point of
order that the conferees, in trying to
define “reasonable,” had added new
substance to the bill. The apresiaing
officer upheld him. The Mallory bill
and all the rest of them were dead.
The Court fight was over for this vear.
HERE IS the 49 to 41 roll call by
Jenner-Butler bill to curb and reverse 4
the Supreme Court. The vote was on a’
motion to table the bill. . aided
Democrats For_-30 “ ‘he
| ea ec
ad Ray
WE Sar tile Ae tl EAE
Ped
mittee. And since they were hooked ‘
tad Se el
*
which the Senate on Aug. 20 killed the |
_ Republicans eae 7
nial Thang
Hea prionper (ews)
Not Voting—s
aa
Wiley
ee
Pa tees
Willams: ipeld ‘
arn A
We BE ee
nounced In favor of tabling: Payne _[
| ie Kon
wot
ahead
dere
amt
to tabling: Freer (D-beat sie
THORS
ai Fle. i Smathers (DF lai).
ndare (Vile ©
whe eee ES iran
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic