◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 27

83 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Sep 2, 1958 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 82 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
Mr. Tamm. Mr, Trotter Mr. W.C.Salifvan Tele. Room Mr. Holloman. Miss Gandy____ Hi High Court Files Defensive Brief \ THE: SUPREME COt T fs sticking firmly by ig against racially seg- regated achools, but the justices are not blithely Ignoring charges that they are rverting the Constitution and abusing udicial power. -- .. - The leng staternent issued last Mon- “day by the court was much more than “gn explanation of the Little Rock school ecision, It was an elaborate defense of e judicial department's prerogatives. "The court is aware that it has critics er than the opponents of schoo! inte- gration, and it has seen fit to offer ‘the ‘general public a brief in its own behalf. It is publicly appealing for support. Defending the theory that it is the proper interpreter of the Constitution, the court cited John Marshall's dictum that it is “emphatically the province and ‘duty of ‘the judicial department to say what ,the law. is.” .And it pointed. out at this theory has prevailed since 1503. In response to the charge that it has iolated state sovereignty, the court cited f nF oct 34 1958 poem Yo LG Articte vi of the Constitution which says that jaws and treaties made under the ‘Constitution “shail be ‘the supreme law | of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby,. anything in the constitutien or laws of any state to the ‘ contrary notwith While defending the rerogatives “Of ‘the judiciary as one of the three branches of the goverhment, the court offers in justification of its school mixing decision the fact that the three justices who have been appointed since that mo- mentous decision approve the ruling. In effect, it says to its critics, “You are questioning the wisdom of not only the nine present members of the court but of three retired justices.” _ ‘The Supreme Court apparently be- eves that these who are criticizing and defying it are menacing. the fundamental structure of the government. Speaking for.the judiciary, it has asked the Foi ‘at large to study its ‘defensive brief and give a decision in its favor. * 1 mo oo we ~ Editorial - "Dallas Times Herald” - Dallas, Texas, //-2-4 Felix R, McKnight, Executive Editor NOT RECORDED 133 OCT 30 1958 ——— ——<—<—s -sommoss
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 40
Jump straight to page 40 of 83.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic