Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 27
Page 39
39 / 83
Mr. Tamm.
Mr, Trotter
Mr. W.C.Salifvan
Tele. Room
Mr. Holloman.
Miss Gandy____
Hi High Court Files Defensive Brief \
THE: SUPREME COt T fs sticking
firmly by ig against racially seg-
regated achools, but the justices are not
blithely Ignoring charges that they are
rverting the Constitution and abusing
udicial power. -- ..
- The leng staternent issued last Mon-
“day by the court was much more than
“gn explanation of the Little Rock school
ecision, It was an elaborate defense of
e judicial department's prerogatives.
"The court is aware that it has critics
er than the opponents of schoo! inte-
gration, and it has seen fit to offer ‘the
‘general public a brief in its own behalf.
It is publicly appealing for support.
Defending the theory that it is the
proper interpreter of the Constitution,
the court cited John Marshall's dictum
that it is “emphatically the province and
‘duty of ‘the judicial department to say
what ,the law. is.” .And it pointed. out
at this theory has prevailed since 1503.
In response to the charge that it has
iolated state sovereignty, the court cited
f
nF oct 34 1958
poem Yo LG
Articte vi of the Constitution which says
that jaws and treaties made under the
‘Constitution “shail be ‘the supreme law |
of the land, and the judges in every state
shall be bound thereby,. anything in the
constitutien or laws of any state to the ‘
contrary notwith
While defending the rerogatives “Of
‘the judiciary as one of the three
branches of the goverhment, the court
offers in justification of its school mixing
decision the fact that the three justices
who have been appointed since that mo-
mentous decision approve the ruling. In
effect, it says to its critics, “You are
questioning the wisdom of not only the
nine present members of the court but
of three retired justices.” _
‘The Supreme Court apparently be-
eves that these who are criticizing and
defying it are menacing. the fundamental
structure of the government. Speaking
for.the judiciary, it has asked the Foi
‘at large to study its ‘defensive brief and
give a decision in its favor.
* 1 mo oo
we
~ Editorial -
"Dallas Times Herald”
- Dallas, Texas, //-2-4
Felix R, McKnight,
Executive Editor
NOT RECORDED
133 OCT 30 1958
——— ——<—<—s -sommoss
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic