Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 28
Page 25
25 / 83
Tit: Constrretion versus Tun Covi 75
ship of property is inherently un-
equal. Therefore, we rule that the
plaintiffs and all similarly situated
for whom the actions have been
brought are by reason of the s0-
called taw of private ownership
complained of, deprived of equal
Protection of the Iaw as guaran.
teed by the 14th Amendinent, .. .
owip this be the “lw of the
lind”?
Tt must be reiterated that the Su-
preme Court has no power to make
laws and there exists no nonsegre-
gation law. Only the Congress can
make “the law of the land” and
that law mice he in pursuance of
the Constitution.
When Napoleon agreed to self
Louisiana to the United States, he
stipulated that Louisiana was to be
admirted to the Union as a State.
Louisiana was to have all the
rights and privileges of the original
13 States.
When Louisiana became a State
in 1812, it agreed only to those pro-
visions as written into the Consti-
tution, Louisiana did nor agree that,
142 years later, it would accept the
dictates of a Supreme Court that
Were not in pursuance of those
Witten provisions,
There are those who urge the
Southera members of the Congress
and the State officials wo live up
to their oaths of office. They have
“the cart before the horse”. It is the
members of the Supreme Court
and the President who should live
up to their oaths of office.
Totegration is a side issuc. The
main issue is: are we, the people,
going to insist that the Federal Gov-
ernment live within the powers
delegated to it by the Constitution,
or are we guing to allow, as Thomas
Jefferson predicted we would, an
unelected judiciary, serving for fife,
to cat away the foundations of our
Constitution ? ;
The War of the Amcrican Revo-
lution was fought to throw off the
yoke of an English king who had
heaped all kinds of abuses upon
the American Colonics. These
abuses are plainly stated in. the
Declaration of Independence.
When those great men drew up
the Constitution, the abuses of the
English Crown were fresh in their
minds and they set about to ereate
a Federal Government under
which such abuses could not exist.
As explaincd in the October,
1957, “AaceRican Mercury.” in
spite of their efforts, abuses have
crept in, These abuses, if not
curbed, could result in some future
Reneration being forced to write 4
new Declaration of Independence
and to fight a new War of the
American Revolution,
In other words, if we arc se stu.
pid as to allow the Federal Govern-
ment to buy us with our own
moncy and, by ignoring the provi-
sions of the Constitution, take our
freedom away from us, our poster-
ity. in order. to regain their free.
dom, will have te de the same
things our furchears dit.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic