Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 29
Page 70
70 / 83
4
———
orw"Ry FRED P. GRAHAM
]
Restrictions | on—Prejudicial | Crime
‘Reporting Ave- Predicted ©
+
Speciel to The New York Times |
MONTREAL, Aug. 6—The'
freedom of the press of the!
United States to printing preju-:
dicial arti about criminal.
defendants may scon come to’
an end, a constitutional law,
expert said tng
Prof, Arthur #. ‘Sutherland of
Harvard Law School made his
prediction in a talk to trial
judges from the United States,
who are here for the 59th con-
vention of the American Bar
Association next week. He said
that the Supreme Court's
recent decision reversing the
murder conviction of Dr. Samuel
H. Sheppard might be “a crack
in the armor" of the press's
freedom to pst what it wishes
a
about a m. acing trial.
Since the Supreme Court has
never rule i “this
point, he urged the trial judges
te “step into the fray"! and as-
sert power to punish news-
papers for contempt if they
print prejudicia! articles,
In the Sheppard decision, the
High Court blamed the trial
judge for failing to insulate the
jury from the prejudicial pub-,
licitty, but Professor Sutherland.
said the decision implied that’
judges had the power ta con-
trol “outside influences” that
might prejudice the trial.
Notes Clark Opinion
He called attention to the!
following passage from Justice;
Tom C. Clark's opinion in the’
Sheppard case: :
“If publicity during the pre-:
ceedings threatens the fairness
of the trial, a new trial should
be ordered. But we must re-]
member that reversals are but
fpalliatives; the cure lies in
those remedial measures that
will prevent the prejudice at its
inception. The courts must take
such steps by rule and regula-
tion that will protect i -
eter Prom prejudicial outside
interference.”
Professor Sutherland men-:
tiqned parpicularly paemefey“of
confessions and previous convic-
tions, when nejther may be ad-
mitted as evidence.
In aspousing the adoption of
«system similar to the one
‘used in England, in which cases,
cf
> wie?
they unfold in court, Professor
ies d champiofei7Ttm
sition of another Harvard
aw professor, Supreme Court
Justice Felix Frankfurter.
During the 1940's the High
Court ruled three times that
the First Amendment's free-
dom of press guarantee pro-
|hibited judges from Punishing
jnewspaper that criticized the
conduct of pending cases,
Frankfurter Dissent
Justice Frankfurter was the
lone member of the court who
insisted that a judge could
snevertheless punish journalists
‘for printing prejudicial articles
about crim defendants,
Fred inson Jr. Assistant
Tal 0 é United
‘States in charge of the criminal.
division, told a meeting of state
bar officials that the public in-
terest may require publication
of certain information ut
crimina] suspects,
He cited the case of REG
F. Speck, who was identified by
the police as the man who mur-
dered eight nurses in Chicago
last month, presumably in an
effort to apprehend him.
My. Vinson said Federal law
enforcement officials would not
initiate prejudicial news stories,
but would release a suspect's
record of convictions upon re-
quest.
At the final session of the
Conference of Chief Justicés,
the delegates, representing 47
states and Puerta Rico, yoted
down a resolution sharply criti-
cal of the Supreme Court's re-
cent decisions limiting police in-
terragation.
eote—icht votes WEre ¢ast:
in favor of the resolution, which
was p med by Chief Justice
treet] Jr. of the ay! |
Ngiiae-Supreme Court.
| Although many of the justices
jhad been critical of certain as-!
pects of the high court's con-|
fessions doctrine during ‘the!
group’s discussions, they said:
e not prepared ‘to at-/
ack the court in stro ,
until *he decision’s effects jaw!
enforcement became k#ewr="
The chief justices indicated
their concern at recent distur-
banees in city slum areas by
condemning “all forms of dis-
fespect for Jaw by both individ-
‘tals and groups,” calling “the
ule of law the only alternative
fto a lawless society."
erent rthe suggestion “Orit 4
\:
af
a
,
\s
tg
42 (
Jenne oat
BeLoach
Mohr
Wick
Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Felt
Gale
Rosen
Sullivan
Tavel
Trotter
Tele. Room
Holmes
Gandy
Juatice Joseph intraub of
New Jersey. who said “many
groups ard individuals Just don't
et attention until they do the
wrong thing, the justices added,
toqiheir resolution the state+
melit that government had a
dau “to deal promptiy and ,
fai with the claimed griev--
jandé&s of the citizens.” :
Cael we 7 —_
Zo 60 eS }
naa ,
A a am
NO “SUN TN GT DR
“A
geet
a
The Washifgrot Post and
Times Herald
The Washington Daily News
The Washington Evening Star ___
New York Daily News
New York Herald Tribune
. New York Post
The New York Times
New York World Journal
New York World
Journal Tribune
The Baltimore Sun
The Worker
The New Leader
The Wall Street Journal
The Nationa) Observer
People’s World
Date _____
uf :
4\
Ne
”
"97 (1966
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic