Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 30
Page 74
74 / 119
ra
r™!~
~
ceo FEDEWAL BUREAU CF INVESTIGATION
Washington, D.C. 20537
REPORT
ol the
Pere eeFteri- 6 Ws at Mmbterkrms PEE
IVENTIFIL ALUN DIVISTU
LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
April 6, 1970
YOUR FILE NO,
FB] FILE NO.
LATENT CASE NO. A-18987
RE: _ wae
Airtel 3-20-70
REF ERENCE: 1
EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: "FO
specimens: QVelope and accompanying letters, Q1 through Q8
Listed @ specimens Gcscribed in Laboratory
report, which is being furnished separately.
Thirty-eight latent fingerprints, one latent
impression and two latent palm prints of value were ceveloped
on envelope (Q1), on three paces of first accompanying letter
(2 through @4) and on three paves of second accompanying letter
(Q5, Q7 and @8). ‘The latent impression may be either a
fingerprint or partial palm print.
On basis of information furnished, no fingerprint
record located fo Aforementioned latent
finrerprints and latent impression are not identical with the
finzerprints of the following persons:
ie _ ~~ i
an
Enc. (8)
(2 - Columbia
<2
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE QNLY | ————O —".
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic