◆ SpookStack

and as stated hy the Supreme Court of the United States, spoak- ing throngh Chief Justice Marshall in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, (1 Cranch 368, 388) when, referring to the safeguarding provisions in the Constitution that the legislative powers be kept aeparate from the powers of the judiciary, that Court said: “To what purpore are powers limited and to what Purpose ie that limitation committed to writing if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained, . ... It is « proposition too plain to be contested, that either the Constru- tion controls any legislative att repugnant to ft, or that the legislature may aiter the Constitution by we Lenmitations are abenrd attempts, on the part pia, to limit a powet in ite own nature il- and, a0 stated by Abraham Lincoln, when, referring 10 our preeent syetean of constitutional checks and limitations and the power of the courts to enforce them, he said: “Whocrer rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy ot despotiem”™; and as stated by Elihu Root, when he said: “A sovereign people which declares that all men have certain inalienable rights, and impoees upon it- self the great impersonal rulés of conduct deemed necessary for the preservation of those ri and at the same time declares that ft will drorctend thee rules whenever, in any particular case, it is the wish of & majority of its voters to. do so, establishes as complete a contradiction to the fundamental prin- Siples of our government as it is possible to conceive.” AND WHEREAS the adoption of such amendment would have the effect to eliminste all distinctions between the powers of leg- islstion which have by the Constitution been retained by the re- spective States and those which were specifically granted to the Federal Government, and would thereby tend to deprive the States of their reserved rights of self-government, and to centralize all powers of government, local and national, in the ae cording as the Congress might from time to time choose; aad thereby such amendment in the aforessid reepects and in other respects would tend to become the basis of arbitrary and unlimit- ed legislative powers in the Congress to disregard, in chosen in- stances, all other constitutional limitations on legislative power and through such processes to change our system of government from a government by law to a government by men: and further would tend to leave the individual citizen and minorities subject to the caprices and whims of temporsry majorities and without the protection of ihe safeguarding principles of the Bills of Rights established by Magna Charta and written into all Amer ican Constitutions, state and federal; AND WHEREAS the advocacy of such constitutional amend- ment can be founded only upon disregard or ignorance of the: principles of government which have made oor American system the most efficient protection against oppression and a scientific model! for the establiahment of evnstitational democracies hav ing in view the freedom of the citizen from the tyranny of either & pure democracy, on the one hand, or of an arbitrary monarchy or oligarchy, upon the other hand; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Heumpin County Bar Association that we express our unqualified opposi- tion to such constitutional amendment or to any amendment of timiler character as a most dangerous menace to our American Government and to American Institutions; and BE iT FURTHER RESOLVED that we individually and colles- tively urge upon all lawyers end upon all citizens, both within and without this Asociation, to exercise the utrnost activity in opposing any such amendment and in teaching ite repagnance to the principles of our Constitutional Government and its menace to the individus] liberties guaranteed by our American Constita- tions; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Reso- Jution be forwarded hy the proper officers of this Association tg every bar association in the country, and particularly to the American Bar Association, with the request that such action be teken that the opposition of American lawyers to such proposed amendment may be announced and published with the utmost emphasis and with the greatest prompttees possible. ’ ak