◆ SpookStack

1 said the technique should be discontinued. Mr. Vermeire. Which one was that? 4 . Ce . ie + ent. tN ’ } Ly Hy Mr. Wannall. I would have to refresh my memory. It ‘ ya t re ie ‘bes a | involved, as I recall, the Communist Party, USA. It was probably in about 1967 or 1968. There was no record of ic | in our headquarters, but our New York office did have a notation on a serial in the file that a telephone call had | been placed to headquarters and approval granted to make | the entry for the purpose not of taking something away but for the purpose of photographing material on the premises. Mr. Oliphant. Were there any surreptitious entries against 13 || | the Socialist Workers Party? ao “J 14 ‘Mr. Wannall. There have been, yes. . ~— . 15 - Mr. Oliphant. Up until what date? 16 Mr. Wannall. I don't know the date. Do you? | Mr. Shackelford. I cannot speak factually but_I . 17 — 18 would generally say up to the ‘66 date. They could have ! 19 iterminated before that. I have no first hand knowledge. 20 Mr. Oliphant. After that ‘date,Mr. Shackelford, were a ei) there any surreptitious entries performed, not by Bureau personnel, but at the behest of the Bureau; in other words, A egg ge = Ro§ 23 a i prises le hee eet ee r at Bede through the use of informants or through the use of people who were friendly to the Bureau? 24 ted ean beh, | yews Mr. Wannall. After 1966?