Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 2
Page 75
75 / 101
¢
tee ge
Mey. s : roa
. .
w?re
fae. ors
‘i
QUESTION:
/ ANSWER:
QUESTION:
ANSWER:
. i permission.
QUESTION:
There is some dictum.to indicate, at
But, I
‘know of no authorization which can be obtained per se
present, that this may be brought up later.
for a surreptitious entry. And, at this point, of
course, the feeling is that these confined as they
are to foreign counterintelligence it flows from
presidential authority as it applies aiso to the
warrantless wiretaps.
| Weren't the civil rights groups, Mr. Kelley, among
some of the organizations who were buralarized?
I'm not going to say anything about where they were,
or against which organizations they were directed,
only to say that they were, Mr. Nelson, and I hope
that will satisfy you, and I hope that if there is
any revelation to be made later that they can be 438
complete as possible because, again, we feel that
the intent was a very good one and there was no
And the imnact of it wae to
et
illegality concerned.
protect the country.
Sir, how can you say that there was no illegality
i concerned if the Constitution says that you have to
Nave a search warrant to make an entry and without,
as I understand it, even checking this with the
Attorney General, these Agents burglarized private
premises?
The resolution of the problem which you now present
is up to the Department and the courts, and I, of
course, will not engage in anything except to say
that in the defense of the men who authorized .and
‘participated, that they had this intent and within
every criminal violation there is a necessity that
there be the ingredient of intent and there was none
here as far as I can determine.
Mr. Kelley, would you say, sir, that most of these
requests for surreptitious entry flowed from presi-
dential authority? Is that what you said, sir?
No, I did not say that. I did not give a complete
outline as to what the authorization was. And, this
again will be a matter which will be discussed in
the reviews of the Department and the various Congres-
sional committees.
-~14-
hl lin Beaune nome on ena meneame amie ters
: eo ot Piel bain
in ena
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic