◆ SpookStack

ee ale enema etl ’ + nr. pre 8 4 ist criminal information, which could well supply us with some i ps or some capabilities toward solving a very bad crime. "LEHRER: there do you personally draw the line between -- An ‘this particular case, between the needs of law enforcement versus a she possible invringewent of privacy on the individual, on the other eee 402d?) «There are chances for abuses here, there are legitimate needs, ds you say, over here. Where do yeu araw the line? A: oy KELLEY: Well, of course, i spoke not Jong ago in this _jomposition about the balance. And there has to be a balance sO jek YOU Fecoecnize tne jndividital rpqnvs and Necas and the ricAts (38 the-very Jeirge group, the” victim and the peopre oF the nation ‘Iho eed become victims, And I think there can be a balance “chieve ™ a . - ‘Most of the probléms which occur-in this area is the Hossibitity that a past record adversely would affect a person applying r a job. And I do feel] that this should be protected in tae sense et only cenvictions should bo released renerding hia. There is | fee ling on the part of some that yeu take this out of the data nk and not make it availéble. Well, it’s available in other manners rex amate, you get it from the court, or there are a tot of organiza Ahich maintain such information. And were we to not make this avatlah hat type of business would probably proliferate, and you'd have te a nuuber of thew who would be compiling the information. LEHRER: tir. Kelley, we have just a couple of minutes ~- jet. Let me ask you some genoral questions here. then you first {look over as head of the FEY and after you'd baen thare a while, that enerced jn your opinion as the -numbcr .one prebl ci thet you “jad tb face inter raally, within the FoI, and the number one thing “hat you wanted to accomplish? =a O .3 een alee elenyee + a he Ve u | UN top gett ree Ly wets e Ls) ‘ -_ iM KELLEY: To try to get the FRI personnel receptive to - the dea of chenge. We are in @ difverent cra. We've lost a amAowho, for aimost Aalf a century; stood head and shoulders above “Nveryone in the field, a man who could just *by saying yes or no Fihange the whole structure. And we now have accountability that ae never had before. We're going to have, therefore, in order to faye that accountability, 7 ordor to revise de sore chanaina ST i 5 PM GARD Qt sey PEERS qt was NY feeling that this was one of the grester necds, end this 4S what I've dedicated a great deal of tine to. “ Another ts to publicize the FRI and make a wore anen \ tance a reality rather than just an idea. And right here today, e‘re engaging in one of my efforts to do that. 1 think ve can e better publicized; I think we cen be better expla ined. 2 think that the people “ant to know how we do our work, Went an explanation qi why we're daing it this way. They're entitled “to it; we're going go give it to then. - : Ane in these, why, there are some problems, but I think pat we're meeting then, pat 7 93 C.. se co | Teer ee ee eer. - - + er ees “Ape eee on