◆ SpookStack

i aaa e PEORIA # . t - 1 oan ¥, - - ] a Pry a QUESTION: _ eal AVhas: conducted ‘surreptitious. entries. dn Securing, in: | tio* some extent, discussed and, to some extent, publicized. ‘I am convinced that in these matters where there might be gome criticism, there is an underlying intent to do that -_ ‘which is good for the Natibn. I have not come across any activities which I would construe as being illegal, being directed toward personal gain ox to enhance the reputation of anyone. I see nothing untoward in these activities, in other words, as they will be reviewed by the various groups. Yow, Mr. Kelley, Mr. Sullivan said about a week ago, t).at he assumed there had been some national security breat:~ins over the years and I'm just wondering if there have bv - national security break-ins, say in the last five yee roughly what number are we talking about and why arc: they illegal? What's the legal authority? There have been statements made about surreptitious entries and the latest was that statement made by Mr. Sullivan who just retired as the Assistant Director in Charge of the Los Angeles Office; and th. - have been, of course, reports in the media that the Department of Justice has been inquiring into allec «6s. shat. our people have engaged in surreptitious entri -*, wep reg ce “ingot aes oh gees agit sete ot Shee Ne ee Ft Lo as “they, are | ‘sometimes termed, burglaries. Yes, the - a . Vetta car wok? a cons woe Mae, relative to the security of the Nation. However, 66, nen