◆ SpookStack

PAGE TWO NH 161-659 HAS NEVER HAD REASON TO QUESTION MARSHALL'S LOYALTY TO U.S. S3ECAUSE OF INTREST BY MARSHALL IN CIVIL RIGHTS AND TRIPS TAKEN ON BEHALF OF U.S. GOVERNMENT, MARSHALL HAS NOT DEVOTED AS MUCH TIME TO BUSINESS OF U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR SECOND DISTRICT AS HAVE OTHER JUDGES. HE IS NOT AS WELL TRAINED AS A JUDGE AS ARE THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COURT AND IS LESS USEFUL BECAUSE OF THIS. HE HAS HAD A MORE NARROW EXPERIENCE . AS A LAWYER THAN OTHER JUDGES OF THE COURT. MARSHALL'S PREVIOUS BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE HAVE GIVEN HIM SOMEWHAT NARROWER VIEW THAN OTHER JUDGES OF THE COURT. HE HAS STRONG VIEWS ON CIVIL RIGHTS AND IS NOT BALANCED AND IMPARTIAL IN THIS FIELD AS ARE OTHER JUDGES OF THE COURT. MARSHALL IS LESS ABLE JUDGE THAN OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COPRT. 24 RETIRED U.S. JUDGE THOMAS W. SWAN, SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS RIVER ROAD, GUILFORD, CONN., ADVISED SA HE HAS KNOWN MARSHALL AS A FELLOW JUDGE AND SAT ON THE BENCH WITH HIM. REGARDS HIM AS ABLE , SINCERE AND IMPARTIAL. BELIEVES MARSHALL HONEST MAN OF DED- ICATED CONVICTIONS OF EQUALITY FOR ALL. ENDORSES APPOINTMENT AS SOLICITOR GENERAL. END PAGE TWO .cccccsecs