Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Thurgood Marshall — Part 3
Page 163
163 / 194
OO J
-
ee
Cierk ; ‘
Supreme Court of the United States b7e
€1 First Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20543
—
. This letter and enclosures is. in resnonse to your letter
dated April 11, 1989 (a covy of which is herewith attached as
ATTACHMENT-1) which is rejected for the following reasons:
Peragraph 1:
The form of the papers and content for ths Writs of In«
junction which I have sent you ere in exact conformity with a Stand-
ard Form contained in the FRCP, The only difficulty which prevell-
ed at the time of preparation, was that I didn't have sufficient
time to rnrepare a complete formal version of the papers, The legal
content was intact, concise, clear, obvious, and noneambiguous and
should heve superseded any cosmetic effects, Those papers hould NOT
have been returned to me, ~_
Paragraph 2:
_ Phe papers which have been sent to you DOES involve judg=
ments of lower Federal Courts and Laws and it also involves Constit-
utional Lew and State Law, That is the reason for which they were
sent to you,
The 90 day time limitation can be legally and properly
waived for Writs of Injunction and for Certiorari, This has been
explained in my previous papers to you which were necessarily in-
formal and abbrevieted due to my lack of time for preparation,
This Court was required to take Judicial Notice of McKinney's Stat-
utes of the State of New York (heavily emphasized copies of which
were sent to you) and was explained in my abbreviated letter. 4
formal Motion for W,iver is currently being prepared,
| You are advised thet this Court hes already ruled (ATTACH-
MENT=-2) that "the time limitation is not jurisdictional and does
not bar our exercise of discretion to consider this case) ATTACH-
MENTS-3A,3B,3C (emphasized) are also sufficiently self-explanatory.
Therefor, this Court DOES have jurisdiction, Since you do not weer
the black robes, you are not in a position to make such ean edverse
Gecision,
You have also steted "thus the Court has no jurisdiction
to consider them on a petition for a Writ of Certiorari, See Rules ;
17 to 21" If you had taken the time and trouble to examine and \
¥
oe
te vane oan oe amb eet | pe be eh nena ame an ee ee ”
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic