◆ SpookStack

_PD-86 they. 6-22-44) 1 F f t ( a. ' Fel H Date: 7/18/65 Teemsmit the foliowing in : Vio__ Airtel 0 woennn- eee ee wenn nanan nnn bee e To: DIRECTOR, FBI FROM: SAC, (77°72488) (RUC) SHALL SPI Re WFO airtel 7/16/65. | We Pa eFTtmaiY APA @Prits Te -m _ ete Ea _ aia LAG VAAN aE Neha Taformati we A 19007 through 19085, contains informatio * nomination of the appointee a 4t Judge. This = - material was reviewed by It contains the 7). commenta of Senators who favored, anc of those who opposed, “— the appointee's nomination and detailed material supporting | ints of view. The following material wes selected as of ~* ed 9/11/62, pages regarding the os, | > At the outset Senator JOHNSTON, identified only as the “* chairman of the subcommittee. of the Committee on the Judiciary, spoke against the nomination stressing that appointee's law - practice wes limited to practice for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored Peéple (NAACP). JOHNSTON =; mentioned that the full committees took the matter up snd =< * reported to the Senate prior to receiving the testimony of th notified that the subcommittee had ar, eubcommittee even thoug concluded the hearings. at ° JOHNSTON mentioned that although the appointee had prace _ -ticed lew in New York since 1938, he had never been licensed” - _ 1.0 practice there. JOHNSTON discussed this as the practice of “Jaw without a license. JOHNSTON brought out that the question af auch nractles ume brousht up in the subsommt ttee hearinas. we Sute freww vauwe Fr Fee a and that in response to a specific question as to whether the | appointee had practiced in New York, the appodntee ais ee a -®] did not.® |