Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Thurgood Marshall — Part 4
Page 9
9 / 101
=~
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Dallas, Texas
June 17, 1958,
wo
An article appeared in the “Dallas Times Herald",
a daily Dallas newspaper, dated May 8, 1958, which stated.
that grommet for the Dallas Independent School District on
Nay 8 , 1958, asked the U. S. oth Circuit Court of Appesis,
Hew Orleans, Louisiana, to settie a conflict between Federal
rulings and recently enacted Texas State Laws which forbid
integration of the public schools without a favorable vote
of qualified electors in the district.” According to this
article, Texas law provides that any school district violating
this law is ineligible for accreditation and State funds
and that any person violating the act is ae of a mis-
demeanor and subject to a fine of $100 to $1,000. Attorney
A. J. THUSS, Dallas School Attorney, stated if the schools
are Gesegregatec in wiclation of Texas State law, the district
would lose $1,500,000 in State funds and chaos would result
trom withholds the students' credits, The suit was filed
st J. W » Texas Commissioner ucation; ROBERT
_S-ACALVERE, Public Comptroller, and x JAMES, State
Treasurer. oN
An article appeared in the metise Morning News",
a Dallas, Texas, daily newspaper, on May 26 » 1958, which
mba dboad bined oe Mae 2o T Sb Ad eh |
SvSueu Lileal Gi may 23; i$ss, the We s§. aeli ViArCULyS Court o1L
Appeals in Mew Orleans, Louisiana, ruled that Federal courts
have no jurisdiction in the involved legal conflicts
surrounding integretion of Dallas schools. Dalias School
Board President, Dr. EDWIN L. RIPPY, indicated that no de-
segregation would be attempted, noting that the ruling puts
the district months back in the entangled situation. Dr.
RIPPY etated that “our” only recourse now is to file a new
suit in State courts. The Gismissal was required, according
én 6h e2anet andi ed ow née Cae eet 2 BaAaee 7 fied a Ad at ine
wo Vase SOUT Wh del WEE gy > beth 4WL SGU Vi FUUULAS Ss Seclaratory.
and for failure to state @ cause of action for declaratory
relief. Dr. RIPPY stated "we" have acknowledged the Supreme
te: Aa Ot By 2 ia b7c
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic