◆ SpookStack

IA 77-1663 "'The activities of the defendant in consection with the foregoing litigation smounts to a complete usurpation of its corporate franchise; is completely outside the corporate charter; is an invasion by the defendant of the legal profeasion in general, and is ebsolutely unatthorized and illegal.’ “The one against the Legal Defense and sgducation Fund says: Phe anenneaeta esnhartar nf tha daafandant mwirnota to suthborizethhe corporation to give legal aid and assis- tance to needy persons whose citil rights are purportedly being violated, Such practice is a complete invasion by the defendant of the legal profession in general and is absolutely unauthorized and illegal in ail respects.' “The suit egainst the NAACP was filed in the Court of Pulaski Cireuit Judge Guy Amsler. The ope against the Legal Defense and Education Fund vas filed in Circuit Judge J. Mitchell Cockriil's Courtf “Bennett is the author of a proposed ordinance which several cities, including Little Rock and North Little Rock, have used in an attempt to get the NAACP to reveal its financisl recards and membership lists. "The MAGCP has challenged these ordinances in the courts and these suits are among those mentioned in the complaints in which attorneys for the two organizations have appeared." LIC On September 23, 1961, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Arkansas, at the above article refers to casenumber 41582 which was filed in Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas, oo December 23, 1957, by the State of Arkansas. Ex Rel,, BRUCE BENNETT, Attorney General, versus the NAACP, Inc. The complatnat listed mine Federal and two state cases in which the defendants through their agents, servants, and/or employees including THURGOOD MARS