◆ SpookStack

FD~-302a (Rev. 11-15-83) WMFO 161D-HQ-1077114 Continuation of FD-302 of ABNER JOSEPH MIKVA , On 9/ 8/94 , Page He has never been denied any employment. He has never been dismissed from any employment or left any employment under unfavorable circumstances. He has never been denied a security clearance by any agency of the Federal Government. He has never been in contact with any representatives of foreign countries, except in the normal course of his official and quasi-official capacity as a jurist and/or member of professional organizations. He has never had any personal or continuing contact with any such representatives. He has never been involved in any type of psychological or psychiatric counseling/treatment with any psychologist, psychiatrist, or other qualified counselor. He has never been a member or officeholder in any organization or club that restricts membership on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, or handicap. He is not aware of any business or investment circumstances that could involve or have involved conflict of interest allegations against hin. He is not aware of, nor is he concealing, any activity/ conduct which could, would, or should prevent him from receiving a position and/or security clearance from the United States Government. Also, he is not aware of any activity/conduct which could be used in any way to coerce, influence, pressure, blackmail, or compromise him if he were to receive such a position or clearance. In addition, he is not aware of any such activity/conduct which could have.an adverse impact on his character, judgment, emotional stability, financial stability, discretion, trustworthiness, or responsibilities. He has never been involved in any civil suit as a plaintiff. He has been involved in only one civil suit in which he was directly named as a defendant. This was the case, MCCLURE vs CARTER, which he listed in the .supplement to his Security Questionnaire. The suit (Number 79-1340) was filed in the United States District Court, District of Idaho. The matter was dismissed by the Court. Thereafter, the plaintiff appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and