◆ SpookStack

454 U.S. Tel. & Te!. Co., ilman Co., 312 ‘tions of the nui- sary and perma- oiting “lewd” or ry alia, (1) “[njo she discretion of injunction,” 631 » assurance that licial determina- of nonobscenity sion of an injunc- y examination of ad definitions of ‘he standards of hich provides for a the hearing on uling priority to does not specify »dings—discloses ued the law so as ies. It is ironic nstrue the many ‘uidance from the mmored an explicit ‘ve those parts of ring that the re- 2 would be better Vashington.” 631 Court of Appeals es had exhausted . Showing that re- utile. There was ider a declaratory . oe ORDERS Se 1025 454 U.S. November 9, 1981 judgment as to the validity of a state law on which the state courts have not yet had an opportunity to speak and on behalf of parties against whom the law has not yet been applied. I would reverse and remand with directions to do now what should have been done initially. - No. 81-186. McCLURE, UNITED STATES SENATOR v. REAGAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. Af- firmed on appeal from D. C. Idaho. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Re- ported below: 513 F. Supp. 265. Appeals Dismissed No. 81-477. WITTE v. BAR COMMITTEE OF THE TWENTY- FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Mo. dis- missed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certio- rari, certiorari denied. Reported below: 615 S. W. 2d 421. No. 81-5422. CRANE v. ROSS ETAL. Appeal from C. A. 7th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the pa- pers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied. Reported below: 645 F. 2d 78. No. 81-478. RABIDEAU v. ATTORNEYS BOARD OF PRO- FESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF WISCONSIN. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wis. dismissed for want of substantial federal ques- tion. Reported below: 102 Wis. 2d 16, 306 N. W. 2d 1. No. 81-524. JOHNSON v. KERR-MCGEE OIL INDUSTRIES, Inc. Appeal from Ct. App. Ariz. dismissed for want of sub- stantial federal question. Reported below: 129 Ariz. 393, 631 P. 2d 548. No. 81-505. CAFFIERO ET UX. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PISCATAWAY TOWNSHIP ET AL. Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. JUSTICE BRENNAN and JUSTICE STEVENS would note proba- ble jurisdiction and set case for oral argument. Reported below: 86 N. J. 308, 431 A. 2d 799. 360-168 O—82——58. OL % ON ae hee ONO BON BAe Ae EEE Oe OR AE et OAS OA AS ARE ee Ee t ri