Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Abner J Mikva — Part 2
Page 19
19 / 99
vA
ae <
FD-302a (Rev. 11-15-83)
WMFO 58A-WF-200802
Continuation of FD-3020f ABNER J. MIKVA ,On 9/27/95 Page 2
MIKVA stated that it was his opinion that the White
House Counsel’s Office needed to advise these individuals that
they needed to divest themselves of certain stocks immediately.
The financial disclosure reports showed these stocks were still
part of their respective portfolios. Judge MIKVA advised that he
spoke with both officials in separate discussions about the
failure to divest.
"TJ went to see TONY LAKE and explained this was a
matter of great concern to us, and he said he thought it had all
been done." MIKVA revealed that LAKE had recalled signing the
various documents to include the actual certificate of
divestiture and LAKE apparently thought that the divestiture had
occurred. Judge MIKVA explained that he believed this was a
situation that "had simply fallen through the cracks."
Concerning the issue of exercising options, MIKVA
stated "r didn’t catch that, I’m not sure that options had been
exercised." Judge MIKVA stated that he advised LAKE, that LAKE
had to do whatever was necessary to correct this matter, so there
would be no embarrassment to either him or to the President.
At this point, advised that Dr. LAKE is re
not going to take advantage of his certificate of divestiture.
Judge MIKVA was not aware if Dr. LAKE prepared his own
financial disclosure forms or if LAKE has someone else do it.
Judge MIKVA advised that it was his mission at the time
to advise TONY LAKE and SAM BERGER to divest as quickly as
possible. LAKE was startled and surprised that divestiture had b6
not occurred. Judge MIKVA indicated that like Dr. LAKE, BERGER’s bic
holdings were diverse and BERGER ‘knew he had been told he had to
divest. MIKVA stated he told both offici j
questions, they could contact either
Judge MIKVA added that BERGER thought that he w
compliance. BERGER informed MIKVA he had asked
whether BERGER holdings were attributable
to him, and informe hat they were not. BERGER
therefore thought he was in full compliance_with the ethics
requirements. According to MIKVA however, __Jclaims that he
told BERGER in early 1994 these holdings were attributable to
BERGER. MIKVA stated that it was his belief that "there was no
mens rea or criminal intent."
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation which
party does
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic