◆ SpookStack

e | ‘3 ; . PAGE TWO NO 245D-7 UNCLAS E FT 0 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND MIAMI AND FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA. ON JANUARY 12, 1984, SAC NEW ORLEANS RESPONDED rof BY LETTER, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF HIS REQUEST AND STATING THAT IT IS BEING REVIEWED TO DETERMINE IF NEW ORLEANS FBI HAS RECORDS . HE IS SEEKING. HE WAS ALSO ADVISED HE WILL BE NOTIFIED aT THE IC EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE CONCERNING THE RESULTS OF THAT REVIEW. AS IS NORMAL IN SUCH FOIPA maTTERS{ was ALSO ADVISED THAT IF HE DESIRES A SEARCH OF OTHER FBI OFFICES OUTSIDE THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, HE SHOULD SUBMIT SEPARATE REQUESTS TO EACH OFFICE CONCERNED. NEW ORLEANS WILL NOTIFY ADDRESSZES wHen[ ts ADVISED THAT HE-IS IDENTIFIABLE IN NEW ORLEANS FILES AS THE SUBJECT OF AN ONGOING PENDING INVESTIGATION, AND THUS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE FIVE, U.S. CODE, SECTION 552, SUB SECTION B7A, HIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL SUCH INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CLOSED. ADDRESSEES RECEIVING IDENTICAL REQUESTS From sOULD RESPOND IN SIMILAR FASHION. AIRMAIL COPIES BEING SENT TO ATLANTA, BALTIMORE, CINCINNATI, HOUSTON, INDIANAPOLIS, LITTLE ROCK, LOUISVILLE, MEMPHIS, MOBILE, OKLAHOMA CITY, PHOENIX, SAN ANTONIO, AND SAN FRANCISCO. roi