Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
DOW-UAP-D48, Department of the Air Force Report, 1996
Page 126
126 / 181
22.
7C, 18 Mar 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Booster engines shut down
prematurely at 129.4 seconds, but booster section was not jettisoned until the near-
normal time of 153 seconds. Guidance was inoperative. Since the sustainer
engine could not gimbal before booster separation, the autopilot was unable to
stabilize the missile after BECO. The sustainer shut down about 40 seconds before
propellant depletion. The reentry vehicle spin rockets fired prematurely at 86.3
seconds after liftoff.
23.
3D, 14 Apr 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Performance of B2 engine
dropped 36% at launch, resulting in a violent pitch as missile left the launcher.
Flight control system corrected missile attitude, and flight continued at reduced
thrust until a more violent explosion tore the thrust section away from the missile
at 26.1 seconds. The sustainer continued operating with decreased thrust until
shutdown by the safety officer at 36 seconds. Debris impacted about 3000 feet
from launch point.
24.
7D, 18 May 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Failure in pneumatic system
resulted in missile explosion at 65 seconds. A temporary failure of the thrust-
structure fairing at liftoff strained the pneumatic lines and disconnects, resulting
in leaks in the pneumatic system.
25.
5D, 6 June 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Either structural damage at
booster staging or failure of the booster staging valve to dose resulted in a fuel
leak and explosion at 159.3 seconds. Impact occurred near the flight line about
780 miles downrange.
30.
10D (Mercury), 9 Sep 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2: Booster section failed
to jettison resulting in a final velocity about 3000 ft/sec low and an impact range
about 500 miles short of target.
32.
17D, 16 Sep. 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: :Flight was considered a
success since impact was within two miles of target point. However, failure of the
vernier hydraulic package resulted in loss of missile control during the vernier
solo phase.
35.
26D, 29 Oct 59, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Vernier solo phase was
unstable in pitch·due to loss of thrust from V2 vernier engine. The V2 engine lost
chamber pressure during booster jettison. Impact was about 14 miles short and
out of splash net.
36.
28D, 4 Nov 59, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2: The flight was normal, but
was terminated prematurely when the range-safety impact-predictor system
failed.
37.
15D, 24 Nov 59, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2.5: Flight was normal, except
the reentry vehicle failed to arm or separate.
9/10/96
117
RTI
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
ufo
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic