◆ SpookStack

Table of Figures Figure 1. Joust Impact Trace Showing a Mode-5 Failure Response. Figure 2. Atlas IIAS Risk Contours for Inner-Ear Injury with A = 3.0. 11 Figure 3. Atlas IIAS Risk Contours for Inner-Ear Injury with A = 3.5. 12 Figure 4. Filter Factor Results for Representative Configurations of Atlas. . 23 Figure 5. Combined Random-Attitude and Slow-Turn Results... 36 Figure 6. Atlas IIAS Breakup Percentages for Random-Attitude Turns. .. 37 Figure 7. Atlas IIAS Impacts with No Breakup 39 Figure 8. Atlas IIAS Impacts with Breakup... 40 Figure 9. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 1,000 ... 42 Figure 10. Atlas IIAS Simulation:Results with B = 50,000. 44 Figure 11. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 100,000.... 45 Figure 12. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 500,000. 46 Figure 13. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 5,000,000... .47 Figure 14. Effects of Breakup q-alpha on A for Atlas IIAS... 49 Figure 15. Mode-5 Density-Function Values at Three Miles .. .51 Figure 16. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.00... 53 Figure 17. Atlas IIAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.00. . 54 Figure 18. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.45... 55 Figure 19. Atlas IIAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.45 .56 Figure 20. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 6.30... 57 Figure 21. Atlas IIAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 6.30... .58 Figure 22. Impact-Range Distributions.... .59 Figure 23. Delta-GEM Breakup Percentages. 61 Figure 24. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with B =-1,000... . 62 Figure 25. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants . 63 Figure 26. Titan IV Breakup Percentages ... .. 65 Figure 27. Titan Simulation Results with B = 1,000.. .66 Figure 28. Titan Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants.. .67 Figure 29. LLV1 Breakup Percentages..... .. 69 Figure 30. LLV1 Simulation Results with B = 1,000.. 70 9/10/96 iv RTI