Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
DOW-UAP-D48, Department of the Air Force Report, 1996
Page 80
80 / 181
Figure 31 shows that a good fit for the no-breakup case is possible if higher values of B.
and A are used. The simulated malfunction-turn impact distributions for the breakup.
cases plotted in this figure are identical with those in Figure 30. Since the theoretical
percentages for B = 1,000 produced excellent fits, these values were simply replotted in
Figure 31. For the no-breakup case, various combinations of B and A were tried before
arriving at the plot shown in the figure.
100
LLV1Random-AttitudeFaituresthrough290 sec
Breakup q-alphain-deg-lb/ft
no breakup
20,000
10,000
10
Percent in 5-deg sector (%)
5,000
A245B10,000
A=2.60B1000
A=270B1,000
A = 2.75, b 1,000
0.1
0.01
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Angle From Flight Path (deg)
Figure 31. LLV1 Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants.
9/10/96
71
RTI
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
staff declassified
flying objects ufo
ufo
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic